Jorge Vargas Monter
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Jorge Vargas Monter has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abel Villa-Mancera
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco 75482, Puebla, Mexico
1 shared publication - Adrian Zaragoza-Bastida
Área Académica de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Rancho Universitario Av. Universidad Km 1, EX-Hda de Aquetzalpa, Tulancingo 43600, Hidalgo, Mexico
1 shared publication - Ana Lizet Morales-Ubaldo
Área Académica de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Rancho Universitario Av. Universidad Km 1, EX-Hda de Aquetzalpa, Tulancingo 43600, Hidalgo, Mexico
1 shared publication - Benjamín Valladares-Carranza
Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Km 15.5 Carretera Panamericana Toluca-Atlacomulco, Toluca 50200, Estado de Mexico, Mexico
1 shared publication - Diana María Sifuentes Saucedo
Universidad Politécnica de Francisco I. Madero
1 shared publication - Eliazar Aquino-Torres
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Antibacterial Plant Secondary Metabolites: Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Translational Potential
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has intensified the need for antibacterial agents with alternative chemical scaffolds and mechanisms of action. Plant-derived antibacterial compounds represent a chemically diverse source of bioactive molecules, but their therapeutic potential depends not only on in vitro potency but also on mechanistic validation, pharmacokinetic exposure, pharmacodynamic relationships, and biological safety. This review critically examines evidence published from 2014 to 2026 on major classes of plant-derived antibacterial compounds, emphasizing bacterial susceptibility, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Reported antibacterial effects include alterations in the cell envelope and membrane, disruption of energy metabolism, inhibition of protein synthesis and nucleic acid-associated targets, efflux and resistance modulation, and interference with quorum sensing, biofilm formation, and virulence. However, mechanistic evidence varies substantially among studies. Pharmacokinetic data reveal marked heterogeneity in absorption, bioavailability, tissue distribution, metabolism, protein binding, and elimination, while quantitative integration of antibacterial potency with active exposure and PK/PD remains limited. Cytotoxicity and in vivo toxicity studies further indicate that selectivity and tolerability are compound-, formulation-, dose-, and model-dependent. Overall, therapeutic translation requires integration of chemically defined antibacterial activity, validated mechanisms, infection-site exposure, PK/PD, host–cell selectivity, systemic safety, and efficacy in relevant infection models.
Open AccessAntibacterial Plant Secondary Metabolites: Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Translational Potential
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has intensified the need for antibacterial agents with alternative chemical scaffolds and mechanisms of action. Plant-derived antibacterial compounds represent a chemically diverse source of bioactive molecules, but their therapeutic potential depends not only on in vitro potency but also on mechanistic validation, pharmacokinetic exposure, pharmacodynamic relationships, and biological safety. This review critically examines evidence published from 2014 to 2026 on major classes of plant-derived antibacterial compounds, emphasizing bacterial susceptibility, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Reported antibacterial effects include alterations in the cell envelope and membrane, disruption of energy metabolism, inhibition of protein synthesis and nucleic acid-associated targets, efflux and resistance modulation, and interference with quorum sensing, biofilm formation, and virulence. However, mechanistic evidence varies substantially among studies. Pharmacokinetic data reveal marked heterogeneity in absorption, bioavailability, tissue distribution, metabolism, protein binding, and elimination, while quantitative integration of antibacterial potency with active exposure and PK/PD remains limited. Cytotoxicity and in vivo toxicity studies further indicate that selectivity and tolerability are compound-, formulation-, dose-, and model-dependent. Overall, therapeutic translation requires integration of chemically defined antibacterial activity, validated mechanisms, infection-site exposure, PK/PD, host–cell selectivity, systemic safety, and efficacy in relevant infection models.
- Open Access
- 24 June 2026
- Published by Kansas State University in Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education
- Vol. 33 (2)
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN ANIMAL PRODUCTION UNITS IN THE VALLE DEL MEZQUITAL HIDALGO, MEXICO
- 24 June 2026
- Published by Kansas State University in Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education
- Vol. 33 (2)
Open AccessTECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN ANIMAL PRODUCTION UNITS IN THE VALLE DEL MEZQUITAL HIDALGO, MEXICO