Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Hannes Vanpoecke has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Melissa De Regge

    Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    2 shared publications
  • Andreas Xyrichis

    Reader at King’s College London, United Kingdom

    1 shared publication
  • Bert R. Meijboom

    Department of Information Systems and Operations Management, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands

    1 shared publication
  • Ivana Žilić

    PhD Candidate in Nursing Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Slovenia

    1 shared publication
  • Kaat De Pourcq

    Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Service Management, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Kristof Eeckloo

    Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent 9000, Belgium

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Addressing Scanxiety Throughout the Cancer Surveillance Journey: A Co-Design Study

    by Hannes Vanpoecke, Kaat De Pourcq, Paul Gemmel, Bert R. Meijboom, Melissa De Regge

    Background/Objectives: Scanxiety, the distress associated with cancer surveillance imaging, is a common concern among cancer survivors. Although most research has focused on the imaging event itself, less is known about how scanxiety unfolds throughout the broader cancer surveillance journey. This study aimed to map the cancer surveillance journey of cancer survivors and identify patient-centred intervention opportunities to reduce scanxiety. Methods: We used a qualitative participatory design involving cancer survivors, travelling companions, and healthcare professionals. Nine co-creation workshops were conducted; in six survivors and companions participated in journey-mapping exercises, while in three, healthcare professionals completed an immersive exercise. All groups subsequently engaged in structured brainstorming workshops to generate intervention opportunities. Data were analysed using abductive thematic analysis. Results: Scanxiety extended beyond the imaging procedure and unfolded throughout the cancer surveillance journey, spanning three phases and seven subphases. Participants identified opportunities to redesign the journey by enhancing existing touchpoints, augmenting the journey with additional touchpoints, and eliminating unnecessary or stress-inducing touchpoints. These opportunities targeted interpersonal, technical, environmental, and administrative dimensions of care. Administrative qualities, particularly timeliness and operational processes, emerged as important contributors to distress. Preferences for support and communication varied, underscoring the need for flexible supportive care during medical surveillance. Conclusions: Scanxiety is a journey-wide experience shaped by both individual and organisational factors. Opportunities to address scan-related distress may include not only psychosocial support, but also improvements in how surveillance care is organised and delivered. The findings provide a patient-centred approach for redesigning cancer surveillance services and identifying intervention opportunities for future evaluation.

  • Enhancing multidisciplinary oncology care: Feasibility of structured tools for Belgian multidisciplinary oncological consultation meetings

    by Nadine Boesten, Melissa De Regge, Hannes Vanpoecke, Mark Leys, Kristof Eeckloo, Paul Gemmel

  • Open Access

    Strengthening Healthcare through Safe Staffing Levels: A European Policy Perspective on Safe Nurse-toPatient Ratios and Workforce Sustainability

    by Paul De Raeve, Hannes Vanpoecke, Manuel Ballotta, Andreas Xyrichis, Yannai DeJonghe, Ivana Žilić

    Safe staffing levels (SSL) are essential to ensuring patient safety, nurse well-being, and health system resilience.