Finn Leschly
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Finn Leschly has a total of 24 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Amr Turkmani
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
1 shared publication - Ashley E. Levack
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
1 shared publication - Brandon J. Yuan
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota
1 shared publication - Gillian Soles
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
1 shared publication Global Orthopaedic Resident Group
1 shared publication- James F. Kellam
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Houston, Texas
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 October 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JBJS Open Access
- Vol. 11 (4)
Assessing Resident Perceptions and Needs
Introduction: Global orthopaedics includes collaborative efforts to improve clinical care, education, research, and capacity across international settings, with an emphasis on equitable, bidirectional, and sustainable partnerships. Interest in global orthopaedics among North American residents continues to grow, yet structured opportunities for clinical, educational, and research engagement in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain limited. This study evaluated the availability of global orthopaedic opportunities within residency programs and assessed resident experiences, perceptions, and interest in expanding these initiatives. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgery residents in the United States and Canada through the Consortium of Orthopaedic Academic Traumatologists (COACT)-affiliated faculty and resident leads. Residents from postgraduate years 1 to 5 were eligible. Survey domains included prior global health experience, opportunities available at home institutions, resident satisfaction with existing resources, and interest in future global orthopaedic engagement. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Thirty of 35 residency programs (85.7%) participated, with 299 of 300 residents completing the survey (99.7%). Forty-six respondents (15.4%) reported prior or current participation in global orthopaedic activities, most commonly through organized teaching or clinical experiences (50.0%), research collaborations (41.3%), and elective international clinical rotations (37.0%). Nearly one third of residents (30.1%) reported that their residency program offered no global orthopaedic opportunities. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the availability of mentorship, elective international rotations, and global outreach opportunities at their home institutions. Despite limited access, interest in expanding opportunities in LMICs was notable, particularly for mentorship and guidance (73.2%), elective international rotations (72.9%), and collaborative research (54.8%). Conclusions: North American orthopaedic residents demonstrate substantial interest in global orthopaedic engagement that exceeds the opportunities currently available. These findings support expanding structured mentorship, international partnerships, and centralized networks such as COACT to facilitate sustainable global clinical, educational, and research opportunities during residency.
- 1 October 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JBJS Open Access
- Vol. 11 (4)
Open AccessAssessing Resident Perceptions and Needs
Introduction: Global orthopaedics includes collaborative efforts to improve clinical care, education, research, and capacity across international settings, with an emphasis on equitable, bidirectional, and sustainable partnerships. Interest in global orthopaedics among North American residents continues to grow, yet structured opportunities for clinical, educational, and research engagement in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain limited. This study evaluated the availability of global orthopaedic opportunities within residency programs and assessed resident experiences, perceptions, and interest in expanding these initiatives. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgery residents in the United States and Canada through the Consortium of Orthopaedic Academic Traumatologists (COACT)-affiliated faculty and resident leads. Residents from postgraduate years 1 to 5 were eligible. Survey domains included prior global health experience, opportunities available at home institutions, resident satisfaction with existing resources, and interest in future global orthopaedic engagement. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Thirty of 35 residency programs (85.7%) participated, with 299 of 300 residents completing the survey (99.7%). Forty-six respondents (15.4%) reported prior or current participation in global orthopaedic activities, most commonly through organized teaching or clinical experiences (50.0%), research collaborations (41.3%), and elective international clinical rotations (37.0%). Nearly one third of residents (30.1%) reported that their residency program offered no global orthopaedic opportunities. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the availability of mentorship, elective international rotations, and global outreach opportunities at their home institutions. Despite limited access, interest in expanding opportunities in LMICs was notable, particularly for mentorship and guidance (73.2%), elective international rotations (72.9%), and collaborative research (54.8%). Conclusions: North American orthopaedic residents demonstrate substantial interest in global orthopaedic engagement that exceeds the opportunities currently available. These findings support expanding structured mentorship, international partnerships, and centralized networks such as COACT to facilitate sustainable global clinical, educational, and research opportunities during residency.