Guillermo Molina-Holmes
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Guillermo Molina-Holmes has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jean Gajardo
Institute of Public Health, Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello, Fernández Concha 700, Santiago 7550000, Chile
1 shared publication - Maria Sylvia Campos
Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, Universidad San Sebastián, Lota 2465, Santiago 7500000, Chile
1 shared publication - Vanessa Jara
Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, Universidad San Sebastián, Lota 2465, Santiago 7500000, Chile
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 November 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 15 (11) , 783
Perceived Benefits and Experiences of Participants in a Community-Based Safe Migration and Human Trafficking Prevention Program in Chile: A Mixed-Methods Study
International migration presents significant challenges for social protection systems, particularly in contexts characterized by vulnerability and limited resources. In this setting, interventions aimed at promoting safe migration and preventing exploitation have gained increasing relevance. The aim of this study was to examine satisfaction, experiences, and perceived outcomes from the perspective of participants in a safe migration and human trafficking prevention program implemented in Chile between 2024 and 2025, while identifying barriers and facilitators associated with program implementation. A mixed-methods study with a convergent parallel design was conducted. The quantitative component included a survey administered to program beneficiaries (N = 131). The qualitative component comprised focus groups with beneficiaries (N = 47) and professionals (N = 29), as well as in-depth interviews with five key informants representing public institutions, academia, scientific societies, and civil society organizations. In addition, a review of program documents and monitoring records was undertaken. Qualitative data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and subsequently interpreted through a multilevel analytical framework. Results showed high levels of satisfaction with the program (M = 4.50/5 (SD = 0.74). Participants highlighted migration guidance, training, and psychosocial support as valuable resources, while irregular migration status, labor market barriers, and discrimination were identified as key challenges. Access to information, institutional support, and social networks emerged as important facilitators of social integration experiences.
- 11 November 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 15 (11) , 783
Open AccessPerceived Benefits and Experiences of Participants in a Community-Based Safe Migration and Human Trafficking Prevention Program in Chile: A Mixed-Methods Study
International migration presents significant challenges for social protection systems, particularly in contexts characterized by vulnerability and limited resources. In this setting, interventions aimed at promoting safe migration and preventing exploitation have gained increasing relevance. The aim of this study was to examine satisfaction, experiences, and perceived outcomes from the perspective of participants in a safe migration and human trafficking prevention program implemented in Chile between 2024 and 2025, while identifying barriers and facilitators associated with program implementation. A mixed-methods study with a convergent parallel design was conducted. The quantitative component included a survey administered to program beneficiaries (N = 131). The qualitative component comprised focus groups with beneficiaries (N = 47) and professionals (N = 29), as well as in-depth interviews with five key informants representing public institutions, academia, scientific societies, and civil society organizations. In addition, a review of program documents and monitoring records was undertaken. Qualitative data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and subsequently interpreted through a multilevel analytical framework. Results showed high levels of satisfaction with the program (M = 4.50/5 (SD = 0.74). Participants highlighted migration guidance, training, and psychosocial support as valuable resources, while irregular migration status, labor market barriers, and discrimination were identified as key challenges. Access to information, institutional support, and social networks emerged as important facilitators of social integration experiences.