Jose Eduardo Carneiro-Barros
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Interests
Jose Eduardo Carneiro-Barros has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Francisco Taveira-Pinto
Department of Civil Engineering and Georesources, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP), Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
1 shared publication - Ivan David Haigh
Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
1 shared publication - Mahmoud Abouhalima
Hydraulics, Water Resources, and Environmental Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
1 shared publication - Paulo Rosa-Santos
University of Porto
1 shared publication - Tiago Fazeres-Ferradosa
Department of Civil Engineering and Georesources, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP), Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 November 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 14 (22) , 2161
Coastal Flooding at Large Scales: Fundamentals and Methods Overview
Coastal flooding threatens lives, infrastructure, ecosystems, and economic activity, making reliable assessments essential for coastal planning and adaptation to sea-level rise. Coastal flood assessments over regional to global scales must reconcile broad spatial coverage with the local processes that control hazardous water levels and inundation. This review examines the physical foundations and methodological approaches used in large-scale assessments, with particular attention to the representation of wave contributions to total water level. Six complementary method groups are considered: analytical and empirical formulations, physics-based numerical models, physical experiments, data-driven models, GIS and remote sensing, and in situ observations. Selected large-scale studies are critically assessed in terms of wave parameterization, coastal morphology, interactions among water-level components, and validation. The review identifies recurring limitations associated with uncertain foreshore slopes, the transferability of empirical relationships, simplified process interactions, and scarce observations of overtopping and inundation. It also highlights that improved offshore forcing does not necessarily yield more reliable shoreline hazard estimates, and that total water level alone cannot determine inland flood extent. A modular, tiered framework combining regional screening with targeted high-resolution modelling and independent validation offers a practical means of balancing coverage and local detail. Further progress requires improved topographic and bathymetric data, systematic flood-event observations, and uncertainty propagation throughout the assessment chain.
- 14 November 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 14 (22) , 2161
Open AccessCoastal Flooding at Large Scales: Fundamentals and Methods Overview
Coastal flooding threatens lives, infrastructure, ecosystems, and economic activity, making reliable assessments essential for coastal planning and adaptation to sea-level rise. Coastal flood assessments over regional to global scales must reconcile broad spatial coverage with the local processes that control hazardous water levels and inundation. This review examines the physical foundations and methodological approaches used in large-scale assessments, with particular attention to the representation of wave contributions to total water level. Six complementary method groups are considered: analytical and empirical formulations, physics-based numerical models, physical experiments, data-driven models, GIS and remote sensing, and in situ observations. Selected large-scale studies are critically assessed in terms of wave parameterization, coastal morphology, interactions among water-level components, and validation. The review identifies recurring limitations associated with uncertain foreshore slopes, the transferability of empirical relationships, simplified process interactions, and scarce observations of overtopping and inundation. It also highlights that improved offshore forcing does not necessarily yield more reliable shoreline hazard estimates, and that total water level alone cannot determine inland flood extent. A modular, tiered framework combining regional screening with targeted high-resolution modelling and independent validation offers a practical means of balancing coverage and local detail. Further progress requires improved topographic and bathymetric data, systematic flood-event observations, and uncertainty propagation throughout the assessment chain.