Evaluation of Team-Based Care Implementation in Primary Health Care Services in Saudi Arabia
Authors:
- Arwa Nasser Al-ZahraniArwa Nasser Al-Zahrani
- Amjad Sulaiman AldahmashiAAAmjad Sulaiman Aldahmashi
- Nashwa Mohamed RadwanNRNashwa Mohamed Radwan
- Nagla El Tigani El Fadil MahmoudNMNagla El Tigani El Fadil Mahmoud
- Amal Hussain AlfaifiAAAmal Hussain Alfaifi
- Khalid Ibrahim Al-AbdulkareemfKAKhalid Ibrahim Al-Abdulkareemf
Open Access
- 27 April 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Saudi Journal of Health Systems Research
- Vol. 3 (1-4) , 42-51
Abstract
Introduction: Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) is starting to transfer the delivery of primary health care (PHC) services from solo practice to team-based care (TBC) model. It is an important to understand factors that affect the integration of this new model of care in the early stage of implementation process to ensure adequate incorporation of this new intervention into the routine work in PHC centers. Normalization process theory (NPT) is a method that helps evaluate the integration of new interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to explain the integration of TBC model in PHC services and investigate the barriers that may hinder the implementation of this model through using NPT. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in PHC centers of Saudi MOH 7 months after the implementation of TBC model. A systematic random sample technique was used to select participants from all Saudi regions. A NPT questionnaire was sent online to the participants to collect data. Results: The study revealed that cognitive participation construct represented the highest score (4.06 ± 0.74) followed by coherence (3.78 ± 0.87) and reflexive monitoring (3.75 ± 0.79) constructs. Collective action construct represented the lowest integration score (3.48 ± 0.68). Gender, years of work experience, and duration of applying TBC model were not significant factors affecting the mean integration scores of the four constructs of NPT. Conclusion: The study recorded good integration scores of the included health staff to TBC model. However, the study demonstrated some barriers that may hinder the implementation progress of the model including inadequate staff training, insufficient resources, and lack of feedback reports. Other recorded barriers are the staff perception that TBC model affects the nature of their work and disrupts the working relationship. Sufficient resources, adequate staff training with close supervision, and providing them with feedback reports regularly are recommended to support and improve the implementation of the TBC model in PHC services.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Requirements for nurse supervisor training: A qualitative content analysisIranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 2016
- The nursing work of hospital-based clinical practice guideline implementation: An explanatory systematic review using Normalisation Process TheoryInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2014
- Team-Based Care: A Critical Element of Primary Care Practice TransformationPopulation Health Management, 2013
- The utility of an online diagnostic decision support system (Isabel) in general practice: a process evaluationJRSM Short Reports, 2013
- Geriatric hip fracture clinical pathway: the Hong Kong experienceOsteoporosis International, 2010
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventionsBMC Medicine, 2010
- Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process TheorySociology, 2009
- Factors Influencing Best‐Practice Guideline Implementation: Lessons Learned from Administrators, Nursing Staff, and Project LeadersWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2007
- Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2003
- Improving Quality, Minimizing Error: Making It HappenHealth Affairs, 2001