IS LABOR'S LOSS CAPITAL'S GAIN? GROSS VERSUS NET LABOR SHARES
- 11 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Macroeconomic Dynamics
- Vol. 22 (8) , 2070-2087
Abstract
US labor share has been falling since the 1970s. I show that it has not fallen as much once items that do not add to capital, depreciation and production taxes, are netted out. Recent net labor share is within its historical range, whereas gross share is at its lowest level. This effect holds for other high-income economies. The overall picture is no longer one of unprecedented, globally declining labor share. Using gross share as a proxy for net share can give misleading results. US gross share and inequality are correlated, whereas net share, the correct measure, is not.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and ProductivityReview of Economic Studies, 2015
- Is Piketty’s “Second Law of Capitalism” Fundamental?Journal of Political Economy, 2015
- FIRM DYNAMICS, ENDOGENOUS MARKUPS, AND THE LABOR SHARE OF INCOMEMacroeconomic Dynamics, 2014
- Trade liberalization and labor's slice of the pie: Evidence from Indian firmsJournal of Development Economics, 2014
- The Global Decline of the Labor Share*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013
- Globalization, creative destruction, and labour share change: evidence on the determinants and mechanisms from longitudinal plant-level dataOxford Economic Papers, 2011
- Understanding the dynamics of labor shares and inflationJournal of Macroeconomics, 2011
- Redistributive shocks and productivity shocksJournal of Monetary Economics, 2010
- THE NEW KEYNESIAN PHILLIPS CURVE IN A TIME-VARYING COEFFICIENT ENVIRONMENT: SOME EUROPEAN EVIDENCEMacroeconomic Dynamics, 2009
- The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National AccountsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2008