Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 May 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Brazilian Dental Journal
- Vol. 29 (3) , 245-248
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using ProTaper Next (PTN), Twisted File (TF) Adaptive, and Reciproc instruments. Forty-five extracted human maxillary canines were selected and randomly assigned into 3 groups. The root canals were prepared using PTN instruments with continuous rotation (n=15), TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion (n=15), Reciproc instruments with reciprocating motion (n=15). During the preparations, canals were irrigated using distilled water and material extruded apically was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. After a 5-day drying period in an incubator, the tubes were weighed and the dry weight of the extruded debris was calculated. Data distributions were assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test, and groups were compared via the Kruskal-Wallis test. The greatest amount of debris extruded by TF Adaptive and the least by PTN, but the difference was insignificant between groups (p=0.259). All instrumentation systems were associated with debris extrusion.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Apical Extrusion of Debris in Flat-oval Root Canals after Using Different Instrumentation SystemsJournal of Endodontics, 2015
- An In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris and Instrumentation Times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex InstrumentsJournal of Endodontics, 2014
- Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni–Ti systemsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2014
- Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systemsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2014
- Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary systemClinical Oral Investigations, 2014
- Apical extrusion of bacteria when using reciprocating single‐file and rotary multifile instrumentation systemsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2013
- Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments?International Endodontic Journal, 2013
- Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single‐file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus MtwoInternational Endodontic Journal, 2013
- Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniquesOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2008
- A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni–Ti rotary instrumentsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2006