What role for deliberative minipublics in sustainability transformations? An emerging topic for sustainability science
Open Access
- 6 February 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 21 (3) , 1365-1381
Abstract
Democracies struggle to translate sustainability science, and public concern into sufficiently transformative actions. Ongoing polarization, politicization and disinformation extenuate this challenge. Some scholars suggest that deliberative democratic innovations can help to bridge science, public understanding and will formation, and policy implementation in the face of vested interests. In light of these challenges, we introduce deliberative mini-publics (DMPs), and why they are of interest to sustainability scientists. DMPs are distinguished from participatory methods more familiar to sustainability scientists by their random and stratified selection of ‘ordinary citizens’. An emphasis is also placed on facilitated deliberation, access to information and learning. Evidence shows that the particular conditions of DMPs can support more deliberative and informed reasoning and offer a considered public voice for decision-makers, fellow citizens and sustainability scientists. However, evidence of their wider effect on society and sustainability is mixed and warrants further examination. We draw on examples from emerging research and experience of DMPs to conceptualize three broad mechanisms for how they could potentially enhance the relationship between sustainability science, publics and politics. These differ based on whether they are primarily aiming to (1) inform policy-makers, (2) support public discourse, or (3) enhance transdisciplinary science. We also explore whether DMPs can challenge unsustainable systems and contribute to transformation through visioning, strategizing transitions, and scrutinizing the decisions of public agencies. We encourage experimentation and critical research on DMPs for sustainability transformations to test and better understand their potential.Keywords
Funding Information
- Stockholms Universitet
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Deliberation and Voting Belong TogetherRes Publica, 2023
- The messy politics of local climate assembliesClimatic Change, 2023
- Expert hearings in mini-publics: How does the field of expertise influence deliberation and its outcomes?Policy Sciences, 2022
- An actionable understanding of societal transitions: the X-curve frameworkSustainability Science, 2022
- Deliberative democracy and the climate crisisWires Climate Change, 2022
- Are citizen juries and assemblies on climate change driving democratic climate policymaking? An exploration of two case studies in the UKClimatic Change, 2021
- Experts and evidence in deliberation: scrutinising the role of witnesses and evidence in mini-publics, a case studyPolicy Sciences, 2020
- Decolonising transdisciplinary research approaches: an African perspective for enhancing knowledge integration in sustainability scienceSustainability Science, 2017
- Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challengesSustainability Science, 2012
- The Ends of Deliberation: Meta‐consensus and Inter‐subjective Rationality as Ideal OutcomesSwiss Political Science Review, 2007