Organ Failure, Endotoxin Activity, and Mortality in Septic Shock
Open Access
- 28 August 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Explorations
- Vol. 7 (9) , e1308
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The relationship between endotoxin activity, organ failure, and mortality is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To test whether the combination of endotoxin activity and organ failure identifies patients at higher risk of death from sepsis and determine the relationship to previously described sepsis phenotypes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational study in four ICUs enrolling critically ill patients with septic shock. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Endotoxin activity assay (EAA) results, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 patients aged 25–95 years and set an EAA cutoff of greater than or equal to 0.6 together with SOFA greater than 11 or MODS greater than 9 to define endotoxic septic shock (ESS). At baseline mean EAA was 0.64 (sd = 0.19), whereas mean SOFA and MODS were 10.3 (sd 3.2) and 5.8 (sd 3.1), respectively. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 were present in 20 patients (23.3%) and these patients had 60% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA less than or equal to 11 occurred in 31 (36.0%) with mortality 12.9%. Of the 35 remaining patients with EAA less than 0.6, 29 (33.7%) had SOFA less than or equal to 11 and 5 of them (17.2%) died. Only six patients (7.0%) had EAA less than 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 and none died (p < 0.001). All patients with MODS greater than 9 also had EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 (12 patients) with 75% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 with MODS less than or equal to 9 occurred in 39 patients with 17.9% mortality (p < 0.001). ESS (EAA ≥ 0.6 together with SOFA > 11 or MODS > 9) occurred in 21 patients and they had significantly higher mortality (57.1% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001) compared with non-ESS, with a relative risk for death of 3.58 (95% CI, 1.86–6.91). Among ESS patients, 7 (33.3%) had δ phenotype, whereas only 4 (5.8%) had δ among non-ESS (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ESS compromises patients with the highest mortality rate from sepsis. Such patients are most appropriate for trials testing anti-endotoxin therapy for improving survival.Keywords
Funding Information
- Spectral Medical
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards Clinical Applications of Anti-endotoxin Antibodies; A Re-appraisal of the DisconnectToxins, 2013
- Bench-to-bedside review: Clinical experience with the endotoxin activity assayCritical Care, 2012
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of Endotoxemia in Critical Illness: Results of the MEDIC StudyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Blocking of Responses to Endotoxin by E5564 in Healthy Volunteers with Experimental EndotoxemiaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003
- The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome predictionIntensive Care Medicine, 2002
- Serial Evaluation of the SOFA Score to Predict Outcome in Critically Ill PatientsJAMA, 2001
- The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failureIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Multiple Organ Dysfunction ScoreCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Shock and Multiple-Organ Dysfunction after Self-Administration of Salmonella EndotoxinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESSThe Lancet, 1974