Luca Molinari

Background: Early stratification of patients at emergency department (ED) admission is crucial. The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has emerged as a promising biomarker to identify the worsening of different clinical conditions. We aimed at evaluating whether baseline suPAR values predict 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients presenting to the ED with different conditions. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled patients with dyspnoea (D), chest pain (CP), and abdominal pain (AP). suPAR levels, together with clinical and laboratory data, were recorded at ED admission. The data collected included 28-day and 90-day mortality data, as well as 28-day and 90-day hospital readmission; and their correlation with suPAR values was assessed. Results: We enrolled 298 consecutive patients (CP 23.8%, D 31.9%, AP 44.3%). suPAR was significantly higher in patients with dyspnoea, compared to both patients with chest and abdominal pain (5.50 [3.50–8.60], 3.20 [2.30–4.10], 3.20 [2.33–4.48] ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). suPAR plasmatic levels were also higher in patients admitted to semi-intensive or intensive care units compared to other patients (4.10 [3.15–8.05] vs. 3.50 [2.55–5.50] ng/mL, respectively; p = 0.049). suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients dead at 28 days than in survivors (12.65 [9.83–18.53] vs. 3.60 [2.60–5.48] ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). Using the stepwise logistic regression analysis, only suPAR emerged as an independent predictor of 28-day mortality with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 1.10–1.56). Conclusions: Baseline suPAR levels are an independent predictor of mortality in ED patients with chest pain, dyspnoea, or abdominal pain.

IMPORTANCE: The relationship between endotoxin activity, organ failure, and mortality is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To test whether the combination of endotoxin activity and organ failure identifies patients at higher risk of death from sepsis and determine the relationship to previously described sepsis phenotypes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational study in four ICUs enrolling critically ill patients with septic shock. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Endotoxin activity assay (EAA) results, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 patients aged 25–95 years and set an EAA cutoff of greater than or equal to 0.6 together with SOFA greater than 11 or MODS greater than 9 to define endotoxic septic shock (ESS). At baseline mean EAA was 0.64 (sd = 0.19), whereas mean SOFA and MODS were 10.3 (sd 3.2) and 5.8 (sd 3.1), respectively. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 were present in 20 patients (23.3%) and these patients had 60% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA less than or equal to 11 occurred in 31 (36.0%) with mortality 12.9%. Of the 35 remaining patients with EAA less than 0.6, 29 (33.7%) had SOFA less than or equal to 11 and 5 of them (17.2%) died. Only six patients (7.0%) had EAA less than 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 and none died (p < 0.001). All patients with MODS greater than 9 also had EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 (12 patients) with 75% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 with MODS less than or equal to 9 occurred in 39 patients with 17.9% mortality (p < 0.001). ESS (EAA ≥ 0.6 together with SOFA > 11 or MODS > 9) occurred in 21 patients and they had significantly higher mortality (57.1% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001) compared with non-ESS, with a relative risk for death of 3.58 (95% CI, 1.86–6.91). Among ESS patients, 7 (33.3%) had δ phenotype, whereas only 4 (5.8%) had δ among non-ESS (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ESS compromises patients with the highest mortality rate from sepsis. Such patients are most appropriate for trials testing anti-endotoxin therapy for improving survival.

Soluble tyrosine kinase receptor Mer (sMer) and its ligand Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (Gas6) are predictors of mortality in patients with sepsis. Our aim is to clarify whether their measurement at emergency department (ED) presentation is useful in risk stratification. We re-analyzed data from the Need-Speed trial, evaluating mortality and the presence of organ damage according to baseline levels of sMer and Gas6. 890 patients were eligible; no association with 7- and 30-day mortality was observed for both biomarkers (p > 0.05). sMer and Gas6 levels were significantly higher in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients compared to non-AKI ones (9.8 [4.1–17.8] vs. 7.9 [3.8–12.9] ng/mL and 34.8 [26.4–47.5] vs. 29.8 [22.1–41.6] ng/mL, respectively, for sMer and Gas6), and Gas6 also emerged as an independent AKI predictor (odds ratio (OR) 1.01 [1.00–1.02]). Both sMer and Gas6 independently predicted thrombocytopenia in sepsis patients not treated with anticoagulants (OR 1.01 [1.00–1.02] and 1.04 [1.02–1.06], respectively). Moreover, sMer was an independent predictor of both prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) > 1.4 (OR 1.03 [1.00–1.05]) and sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) (OR 1.05 [1.02–1.07]). An early measurement of the sMer and Gas6 plasma concentration could not predict mortality. However, the biomarkers were associated with AKI, thrombocytopenia, PT-INR derangement and SIC, suggesting a role in predicting sepsis-related organ damage.

OBJECTIVES: To describe study design considerations and to simulate a trial of biomarker-guided sepsis management aimed to reduce acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury). Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7, urinary biomarkers of cell-cycle arrest, and indicators of kidney stress can detect acute kidney injury before clinical manifestations. We sought to determine the event rates for acute kidney injury as a function of serial measurements of urinary (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2)•(insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7) in patients at risk of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, so that an escalating series of kidney-sparing sepsis bundles based on international guidelines could be applied. DESIGN: We described the study protocol of “Limiting acute kidney injury Progression In Sepsis,” a phase 4, multicenter, adaptive, randomized controlled trial. We performed simulations to estimate the rates for the trial’s primary endpoint using patient-level data from two previous studies (Sapphire and Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock). SETTING: Academic and community ICUs. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock, without evidence of stage 2/3 acute kidney injury at enrollment. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Our primary endpoint is progression of two or more stages of acute kidney injury, death, or dialysis within 72 hours after enrollment. In the Sapphire simulation, 45 of 203 patients (22%) with sepsis met the endpoint. In Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock, 144 of 607 patients (24%) with septic shock met the endpoint. In both simulations, (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2)•(insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7) patterns, suggested by Limiting acute kidney injury Progression In Sepsis protocol, stratified the risk for the endpoint from 6% (three negative tests) to 41% (for patients eligible for the highest level of kidney-sparing sepsis bundle) in Sapphire, and 14% (two negative tests) to 46% (for the highest level of kidney-sparing sepsis bundle) in Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of our Limiting acute kidney injury Progression In Sepsis trial simulation confirmed that (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2)•(insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7) could identify patients with different rates of progression to moderate/severe acute kidney injury, death, or dialysis in 72 hours. The Limiting acute kidney injury Progression In Sepsis protocol algorithm is therefore feasible in terms of identifying suitably high-risk individuals for kidney-sparing sepsis bundle.

Full Papers; Authors: M. Bellan, M. Quaglia, A. Nerviani, D. Mauro, M. Lewis, F. Goegan, A. Gibbin, S. Pagani, L. Salmi, L. Molinari, L.M. Castello, G.C. Avanzi, V. Cantaluppi, M. Pirisi, P.P. Sainaghi, C. Pitzalis

In the perioperative setting, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication, and AKI itself is associated with adverse outcomes such as higher risk of chronic kidney disease and mortality. Various risk factors are associated with perioperative AKI, and identifying them is crucial to early interventions addressing modifiable risk and increasing monitoring for nonmodifiable risk. Different mechanisms are involved in the development of postoperative AKI, frequently picturing a multifactorial etiology. For these reasons, no single renoprotective strategy will be effective for all surgical patients, and efforts have been attempted to prevent kidney injury in different ways. Some renoprotective strategies and treatments have proven to be useful, some are no longer recommended because they are ineffective or even harmful, and some strategies are still under investigation to identify the best timing, setting, and patients for whom they could be beneficial. With this review, we aim to provide an overview of recent findings from studies examining epidemiology, risk factors, and mechanisms of perioperative AKI, as well as different renoprotective strategies and treatments presented in the literature.

The aim of this study was to describe the population of patients arriving in several Italian Emergency Departments (EDs) complaining of chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in order to evaluate the incidence of ACS in this cohort and the association between ACS and different clinical parameters and risk factors. This is an observational prospective study, conducted from the 1st January to the 31st December 2014 in 11 EDs in Italy. Patients presenting to ED with chest pain, suggestive of ACS, were consecutively enrolled. Patients with a diagnosis of ACS (N.=1800) resulted to be statistically significant older than those without ACS (NO ACS; N.=4630) (median age: 70 vs. 59, P<0.001), and with a higher prevalence of males (66.1% in ACS vs. 57.5% in NO ACS, P<0.001). ECG evaluation, obtained at ED admission, showed new onset alterations in 6.2% of NO ACS and 67.4% of ACS patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the following parameters were predictive for ACS: age, gender, to be on therapy for cardio-vascular disease (CVD), current smoke, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart rate, ECG alterations, increased BMI, reduced SaO2. Results from this observational study strengthen the importance of the role of the EDs in ruling in and out chest pain patients for the diagnosis of ACS. The analysis put in light important clinical and risk factors that, if promptly recognized, can help Emergency Physicians to identify patients who are more likely to be suffering from ACS.

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host-response to infections. Osteopontin (OPN) is an extracellular matrix protein involved in the inflammatory response. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance in sepsis of a single OPN determination in the Emergency Department (ED). We conducted a single-centre prospective observational study in an Italian ED where we enrolled 102 consecutive patients presenting with suspected infection and qSOFA ≥ 2. OPN plasma concentration was found to be an independent predictor of sepsis (OR = 1.020, 95% CI 1.002–1.039, p = 0.031) and the diagnostic receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878. OPN levels were positively correlated to plasma creatinine (r = 0.401 with p = 0.0001), but this relation was not explained by the development of acute kidney injury (AKI), since no difference was found in OPN concentration between AKI and non-AKI patients. The analysis of 30-days mortality showed no significant difference in OPN levels between alive and dead patients (p = 0.482). In conclusion, a single determination of OPN concentration helped to identify patients with sepsis in the ED, but it was not able to predict poor prognosis in our cohort of patients.