Detecting Selection Bias in Observational Studies—When Interventions Work Too Fast
Authors:
- 1 September 2023
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Internal Medicine
- Vol. 183 (9) , 897-898
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses the limitations that observational studies have in drawing causal inferences.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Target Trial EmulationJAMA, 2022
- Geriatrician assessment and immortal time bias in the FiTR 2 studyThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2022
- Comparison of a Target Trial Emulation Framework vs Cox Regression to Estimate the Association of Corticosteroids With COVID-19 MortalityJAMA Network Open, 2022
- Effectiveness of a second BNT162b2 booster vaccine against hospitalization and death from COVID-19 in adults aged over 60 yearsNature Medicine, 2022
- Comparison of 2-year outcomes with CAR T cells (ZUMA-1) vs salvage chemotherapy in refractory large B-cell lymphomaBlood Advances, 2021
- Clinical Outcomes Associated With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial FibrillationJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2021
- Bisphosphonates and mortality: confounding in observational studies?Osteoporosis International, 2019
- Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journalsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004