Hip Revision Arthroplasty of Periprosthetic Fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 with a Modular Revision Stem: Short-Term Results and Review of Literature
- 3 August 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
- Vol. 160 (01) , 40-48
Abstract
Background Periprosthetic fractures Vancouver type B2/B3 after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging entity with increasing numbers. Limited data are available for this type of fracture treated with modular stems. Therefore, this study evaluated the outcome of Vancouver type B2/B3 fractures treated with a modular hip revision stem using a subproximal/distal anchorage and compared it to the current literature. Materials and Methods A consecutive series of periprosthetic Vancouver type B2/B3 fractures treated with a modular revision stem was retrospectively (2013 – 2016) evaluated. Assessment included the clinical (HHS, pain, ROM) as well as the radiological outcome (subsidence, loosening, facture healing). In adddition, the surgical technique is described in detail and results are compared with the current literature. Results A total of 18 patients (female/male 12/6) with Vancouver B2/B3 (n = 12/6) fractures with a mean age of 75.5 (60 – 89) years were included. The revision stem was inserted via a modified transgluteal approach (n = 16) or classical transfemoral approach (n = 2). The mean follow-up was 18.5 months, with a mean Harris Hip Score of 72.5 ± 18.7 (35.0 – 99.0) points. The fracture healing rate was 94.4% (n = 17) with osseous integration according to Engh in all cases. Dislocations of the greater trochanter were recorded in seven patients (38.9%). According to Beals and Towers, all results were rated excellent or good. No implant-related failure or relevant subsidence during this time was observed. Major complications were observed in five patients with two periprosthetic joint infections and two cases of major revision surgery. Conclusion This study assessing Vancouver B2/3 fractures shows reproducible, good, short-term results in terms of subsidence and clinical functional outcome by the use of a modular revision stem. The transfemoral approach together with the modular stem allows for a stable fixation and good fracture healing. However, our data and review of the literature also documents the difficulties and higher complication rate associated with Vancouver B2/3 fractures.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Modular Fluted, Tapered StemsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2013
- Hip Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Fractures of Vancouver Type B2 and B3Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2012
- Distal Interlocking Screws With a Modular Revision Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Severe Bone DefectsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010
- Management of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Distal Fixation Using a Modular Femoral Stem Using an Anterolateral ApproachThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2009
- Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy for the Treatment of Vancouver B2/B3 Periprosthetic Fractures of the FemurThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008
- A Modified Transfemoral Approach Using Modular Cementless Revision StemsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2007
- The excess mortality due to periprosthetic femur fracture. A study from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty registerBone, 2007
- Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures with the Bicontact Revision StemZeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete, 2007
- EPIDEMIOLOGYOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999
- The Transgluteal Approach to the Hip JointArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 1979