Updates on Grading and Staging of Prostate Cancer
- 1 December 2018
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Surgical Pathology Clinics
- Vol. 11 (4) , 759-774
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact on the Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer by the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Modified Gleason Grading SystemAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2012
- International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced diseaseLaboratory Investigation, 2011
- Histopathological findings after treatment of prostate cancer using high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)The Prostate, 2010
- The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practiceHistopathology, 2009
- Twenty‐four‐month postradiation prostate biopsies are strongly predictive of 7‐year disease‐free survivalCancer, 2009
- Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate does not confer poor prognosisUrology, 2006
- Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significanceLaboratory Investigation, 2006
- Trends in Reporting Gleason Score 1991 to 2001: Changes in the Pathologist's PracticeEuropean Urology, 2005
- Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostateLaboratory Investigation, 2004
- Gleason Score 2–4 Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Needle BiopsyAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2000