Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories
Authors:
- Giuseppe LippiGLGiuseppe Lippi
- Giuseppe BanfiGBGiuseppe Banfi
- Mauro ButtarelloMBMauro Buttarello
- Ferruccio CeriottiFCFerruccio Ceriotti
- Massimo DavesMDMassimo Daves
- Alberto DolciADAlberto Dolci
- Marco CaputoMCMarco Caputo
- Davide GiavarinaDGDavide Giavarina
- Martina MontagnanaMMMartina Montagnana
- Valentino MiconiVMValentino Miconi
- Bruno MilanesiBMBruno Milanesi
- Andrea MoscaAMAndrea Mosca
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Vol. 45 (6) , 728-736
Abstract
A large body of evidence attests that quality programs developed around the analytical phase of the total testing process would only produce limited improvements, since the large majority of errors encountered in clinical laboratories still prevails within extra-analytical areas of testing, especially in manually intensive preanalytical processes. Most preanalytical errors result from system flaws and insufficient audit of the operators involved in specimen collection and handling responsibilities, leading to an unacceptable number of unsuitable specimens due to misidentification, in vitro hemolysis, clotting, inappropriate volume, wrong container or contamination from infusive routes. Detection and management of unsuitable samples are necessary to overcome this variability. The present document, issued by the Italian Inter-society SIBioC-SIMeL-CISMEL (Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology-Italian Society of Laboratory Medicine-Italian Committee for Standardization of Hematological and Laboratory Methods) Study Group on Extra-analytical Variability, reviews the major causes of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories, providing consensus recommendations for detection and management.Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:728–36.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample?Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 2006
- Interference of Blood Cell Lysis on Routine Coagulation TestingArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2006
- Needles and needleless devices for infusion of anti‐haemophilic factor concentrate: impact on protein structure and functionHaemophilia, 2005
- Coagulation AssaysCirculation, 2005
- Automated Processing of Serum Indices Used for Interference Detection by the Laboratory Information SystemClinical Chemistry, 2005
- Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicineClinics In Laboratory Medicine, 2004
- Physician Survey of a Laboratory Medicine Interpretive Service and Evaluation of the Influence of Interpretations on Laboratory Test OrderingArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2004
- The truth about quality: medical usefulness and analytical reliability of laboratory testsClinica Chimica Acta, 2004
- Human error: models and managementBMJ, 2000
- Minimum Specimen Volume Requirements for Routine Coagulation Testing:Dependence on Citrate ConcentrationAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1998