Early Outcomes of an Artificial Endothelial Replacement Membrane Implantation After Failed Repeat Endothelial Keratoplasty
Open Access
- 22 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Cornea
- Vol. 43 (9) , 1088-1094
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of a novel artificial endothelial replacement membrane implant for treating corneal edema after failed repeat endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Design: This was a retrospective interventional case series. Methods: Patients with chronic corneal edema underwent removal of the EK graft and implantation of an artificial endothelial replacement membrane (EndoArt, EyeYon Medical, Israel) several months after 2 or more Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty procedures. The implant was secured to the posterior corneal surface using an air–gas bubble. Outcome measures included corrected distance visual acuity (logMAR), central corneal thickness, device-related complications, and ocular discomfort. Results: Five eyes of 5 patients underwent EndoArt implantation. Six months after surgery, the synthetic endothelial replacement membrane was well-centered and adherent to the posterior corneal surface, with improvement in central corneal transparency in all patients. Corrected distance visual acuity increased from mean 1.26 ± 0.25 (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.74 ± 0.44 (logMAR) postoperatively (P = 0.06). Central corneal thickness significantly decreased from a mean of 805 ± 135 μm (excluding the EK graft) preoperatively to 588 ± 60 μm (excluding the EndoArt) postoperatively (P = 0.015). No severe device-related complications developed after surgery, although most patients required more than 1 air–gas bubble injection to achieve complete implant adhesion. All patients experienced preoperative reduction in subjective ocular pain. Conclusions: Synthetic endothelial replacement membrane implantation improves central corneal transparency and visual acuity in patients with failed EK and guarded prognosis for repeat keratoplasty. No significant implant-related adverse events occurred after surgery.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Survival of Penetrating and Lamellar Transplants in Management of Failed Corneal GraftsJAMA Ophthalmology, 2018
- The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 2018
- In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and DiseaseThe Ocular Surface, 2017
- Midterm Results of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: 4 to 7 Years Clinical OutcomeAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016
- Five-Year Graft Survival Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating KeratoplastyOphthalmology, 2016
- Outcomes After DSEK in 101 Eyes With Previous Trabeculectomy and Tube Shunt ImplantationCornea, 2014
- Outcomes of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Pseudophakic Bullous KeratopathyCornea, 2014
- Descemet's Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyOphthalmology, 2011
- In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy after Non–Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial KeratoplastyOphthalmology, 2009
- Pathology of Late Endothelial Failure: Late Endothelial Failure of Penetrating Keratoplasty: Study with Light and Electron MicroscopyCornea, 2000