Five-Year Graft Survival Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty
- 1 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Ophthalmology
- Vol. 123 (8) , 1646-1652
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty With a Donor Insertion Device: Clinical Results and Complications in 100 EyesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013
- Cost-Effectiveness of Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Penetrating KeratoplastyOphthalmology, 2013
- Indications, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Failure in Tectonic KeratoplastyOphthalmology, 2012
- Endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyesClinical Ophthalmology, 2012
- Corneal Transplantation: Changing TechniquesTransplantation, 2011
- Donor and surgical risk factors for primary graft failure following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Asian eyesClinical Ophthalmology, 2011
- Descemet's Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyOphthalmology, 2011
- Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and OutcomesOphthalmology, 2009
- Recipient Risk Factors for Graft Failure in the Cornea Donor StudyOphthalmology, 2009
- Penetrating Keratoplasty in Asian EyesOphthalmology, 2008