Effect of a Glaze/Composite Sealant on the 3-D Surface Roughness of Esthetic Restorative Materials
Authors:
- C. R. PerezCPC. R. Perez
- R. HirataRHR. Hirata
- A. H. M. F. T. SilvaASA. H. M. F. T. Silva
- E. M. SampaioESE. M. Sampaio
- M. S. MirandaMMM. S. Miranda
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- Published by Operative Dentistry in Operative Dentistry
- Vol. 34 (6) , 674-680
Abstract
SUMMARY: The main goal of the current study was to evaluate the surface roughness of tooth-colored restorative materials after different finishing/polishing protocols, including a liquid polisher (BisCover, BISCO, Schaumburg, IL, USA). The restorative materials tested included two nanofilled resin composites (Filtek Supreme, 3M Dental Products, St Paul, MN, USA and Grandio, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer, 3M Dental Products) and one conventional glass ionomer cement (Meron Molar ART, Voco). The finishing/polishing methods were divided into five groups: G1 (compression with Mylar matrix), G2 (finishing with diamond burs), G3 (Sof-Lex, 3M Dental Products), G4 (BisCover, BISCO, after diamond burs) and G5 (BisCover after Sof-Lex). Five cylindrical specimens of each material were prepared for each group according to the manufacturer's instructions. The finishing/polishing methods were performed by a single operator in one direction to avoid variations at low speed (15,000 RPM). The surface roughness was evaluated using a 3-D scanning instrument with two parameters considered (Ra and Rz). The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a multiple comparison Tukey's test. The results showed that BisCover (BISCO) was capable of reducing surface roughness and provided polished surfaces for all materials, enhancing smoothness over already polished surfaces (Sof-Lex, 3M Dental Products) and achieving polishing after finishing with diamond burs.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitroDental Materials, 2006
- Laboratory study of the loads, speeds and times to finish and polish direct restorative materialsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2005
- The in vivo perception of roughness of restorationsBritish Dental Journal, 2004
- Analysis of surface roughness of glass–ionomer cements and compomerJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2003
- Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth‐coloured restorativesJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2003
- Surface roughness evaluation of resin modified glass–ionomers polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gelJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1999
- Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth‐coloured restorativesJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1998
- Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literatureDental Materials, 1997
- The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: A profilometric and scanning electron microscopy studyThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996
- Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin compositesDental Materials, 1994