Takeover Requests in Highly Automated Truck Driving: How Do the Amount and Type of Additional Information Influence the Driver–Automation Interaction?
Open Access
- 4 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
- Vol. 2 (4) , 68
Abstract
Vehicle automation is linked to various benefits, such as increase in fuel and transport efficiency as well as increase in driving comfort. However, automation also comes with a variety of possible downsides, e.g., loss of situational awareness, loss of skills, and inappropriate trust levels regarding system functionality. Drawbacks differ at different automation levels. As highly automated driving (HAD, level 3) requires the driver to take over the driving task in critical situations within a limited period of time, the need for an appropriate human–machine interface (HMI) arises. To foster adequate and efficient human–machine interaction, this contribution presents a user-centered, iterative approach for HMI evaluation of highly automated truck driving. For HMI evaluation, a driving simulator study [n = 32] using a dynamic truck driving simulator was conducted to let users experience the HMI in a semi-real driving context. Participants rated three HMI concepts, differing in their informational content for HAD regarding acceptance, workload, user experience, and controllability. Results showed that all three HMI concepts achieved good to very good results in these measures. Overall, HMI concepts offering more information to the driver about the HAD system showed significantly higher ratings, depicting the positive effect of additional information on the driver–automation interaction.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- An exploratory study of long-haul truck drivers’ secondary tasks and reasons for performing themAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2018
- Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehiclesAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2018
- Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic SituationsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2016
- Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road studyTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015
- Utilization of Drivetime – Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks While Driving Highly AutomatedProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2015
- Recommendations Supporting Situation Awareness in Partially Automated Driver Assistance SystemsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014
- Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicleTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014
- Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate RelianceHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004
- Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, AbuseHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1997
- The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in AutomationHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995