What You See Is Not What Is There: Mechanisms, Models and Methods for Point Pattern Deviations
- 1 February 2026
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Mathematical Statistics in Statistical Science
- Vol. 41 (1) , 143-162
Abstract
Many natural systems are observed as point patterns in time, space, or space and time. Examples include plant and cellular systems, animal colonies, earthquakes and wildfires. In practice, the locations of the points are not always observed correctly. However, in the point process literature, there has been relatively scant attention paid to the issue of errors in the location of points. In this paper, we discuss how the observed point pattern may deviate from the actual point pattern and review methods and models that exist to handle such deviations. The discussion is supplemented with several scientific illustrations.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 110 references indexed in Scilit:
- A flexible and efficientBayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture–recapture dataEcology, 2022
- Identifying prognostic structural features in tissue sections of colon cancer patients using point pattern analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2018
- Discovering early diabetic neuropathy from epidermal nerve fiber patternsStatistics in Medicine, 2016
- Spatial prediction in the presence of positional errorEnvironmetrics, 2010
- Spatial autocorrelation among automated geocoding errors and its effects on testing for disease clusteringStatistics in Medicine, 2010
- Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns2007
- Geographically masking health data to preserve confidentialityStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- A Random Field Approach to Transect Counts of Wildlife PopulationsBiometrical Journal, 1991
- Second‐order Characteristics for Stochastic Structures Connected with Gibbs Point ProcessesMathematische Nachrichten, 1991
- A Remark on the Line Transect MethodBiometrical Journal, 1982