How well are dental qualitative studies involving interviews and focus groups reported?
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Dentistry
- Vol. 84, 44-48
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journalsTrials, 2012
- An appraisal of the quality of published qualitative dental researchCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2010
- Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groupsBritish Dental Journal, 2008
- Qualitative research in dentistryBritish Dental Journal, 2008
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?Field Methods, 2006
- Making sense of qualitative research: a new seriesMedical Education, 2004
- Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research NoteQualitative Research, 2004
- “Placing” Interviews: Location and Scales of Power in Qualitative ResearchThe Professional Geographer, 2000
- Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey.American Journal of Public Health, 1993