Aliki Tsichlaki
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Aliki Tsichlaki has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Padhraig S. Fleming
Division of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
7 shared publicationsAma Johal
Department of Orthodontics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
3 shared publications- Dalya Al-Moghrabi
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 shared publications Kevin O'Brien
Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
2 shared publications- Padhraig S. Fleming
Chair/Professor of Orthodontics, Dublin Dental University Hospital, School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
2 shared publications - Philip Edward Benson
Academic Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 December 2023
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 165 (4) , 385-398.e5
“Over-reviewing” of research? An analysis of orthodontic reviews
- 25 December 2023
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 165 (4) , 385-398.e5
Open Access“Over-reviewing” of research? An analysis of orthodontic reviews
- 15 July 2023
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 164 (3) , e72-e88
The dark side of fixed retainers: Case series
- 15 July 2023
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 164 (3) , e72-e88
The dark side of fixed retainers: Case series
- 1 November 2020
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 158 (5) , 650-660
Development of a core outcome set for use in routine orthodontic clinical trials
- 1 November 2020
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 158 (5) , 650-660
Development of a core outcome set for use in routine orthodontic clinical trials
- 10 October 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
- Vol. 21 (4) , 387-406
A systematic review of relative indications and contra-indications for prescribing panoramic radiographs in dental paediatric patients
Purpose To systematically review the evidence of the diagnostic efficacy of panoramic radiographs (PRs) in the following six clinical situations: caries, acute dental infections, dental trauma, dental anomalies, Developmental disorders and pathological conditions in children. The research question posed by the EAPD was: "In which clinical situations and age groups is it indicated/contra-indicated to prescribe PRs in relation to these six clinical situations, in children". Methods An electronic search of the following databases was conducted: MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), the Database of s of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Cochrane Health Technology Assessment (HTA), to identify relevant studies published from 1990 to 2018. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment of included studies was carried out independently and in duplicate using the QUADAS 2 tool. Results The search resulted in 3420 potentially relevant studies, and following screening 175 full texts were obtained, of which 16 were finally included in the review. Meta-analysis was not possible for any of the aforementioned clinical situations, therefore the included studies were tabulated in terms of qualitative descriptive hierarchy of evidence for diagnostic. Conclusion Based on currently available evidence there is a need for high quality diagnostic accuracy efficacy studies to address important diagnostic tasks in these six clinical situations in children, as there is a lack of scientific evidence concerning PRs in children, as there would support the production of guidelines for prescribing PRs in children along with their relative indications and contra-indications.
- 10 October 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
- Vol. 21 (4) , 387-406
A systematic review of relative indications and contra-indications for prescribing panoramic radiographs in dental paediatric patients
Purpose To systematically review the evidence of the diagnostic efficacy of panoramic radiographs (PRs) in the following six clinical situations: caries, acute dental infections, dental trauma, dental anomalies, Developmental disorders and pathological conditions in children. The research question posed by the EAPD was: "In which clinical situations and age groups is it indicated/contra-indicated to prescribe PRs in relation to these six clinical situations, in children". Methods An electronic search of the following databases was conducted: MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), the Database of s of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Cochrane Health Technology Assessment (HTA), to identify relevant studies published from 1990 to 2018. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment of included studies was carried out independently and in duplicate using the QUADAS 2 tool. Results The search resulted in 3420 potentially relevant studies, and following screening 175 full texts were obtained, of which 16 were finally included in the review. Meta-analysis was not possible for any of the aforementioned clinical situations, therefore the included studies were tabulated in terms of qualitative descriptive hierarchy of evidence for diagnostic. Conclusion Based on currently available evidence there is a need for high quality diagnostic accuracy efficacy studies to address important diagnostic tasks in these six clinical situations in children, as there is a lack of scientific evidence concerning PRs in children, as there would support the production of guidelines for prescribing PRs in children along with their relative indications and contra-indications.
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Dentistry
- Vol. 84, 44-48
How well are dental qualitative studies involving interviews and focus groups reported?
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Dentistry
- Vol. 84, 44-48
How well are dental qualitative studies involving interviews and focus groups reported?
- Open Access
- 28 March 2019
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 46 (1_suppl) , 17-20
Prioritising patients in research and practice – why and how?
There is an increasing emphasis on the incorporation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in healthcare. Development, implementation and adoption of these is fundamental in prioritising orthodontic research and practice.
- 28 March 2019
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 46 (1_suppl) , 17-20
Open AccessPrioritising patients in research and practice – why and how?
There is an increasing emphasis on the incorporation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in healthcare. Development, implementation and adoption of these is fundamental in prioritising orthodontic research and practice.
- 1 June 2018
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 153 (6) , 797-807
Orthodontic trial outcomes: Plentiful, inconsistent, and in need of uniformity? A scoping review
- 1 June 2018
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 153 (6) , 797-807
Orthodontic trial outcomes: Plentiful, inconsistent, and in need of uniformity? A scoping review
- Open Access
- 1 September 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 18 (1) , 407
Erratum to Development of a core outcome set for orthodontic trials using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for a multicentre study
- 1 September 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 18 (1) , 407
Open AccessErratum to Development of a core outcome set for orthodontic trials using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for a multicentre study