Prediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from contrast agent‐free diffusion MRI in suspicious breast lesions found on screening mammography.
- 2 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 46 (2) , 604-616
Abstract
Purpose: To assess radiomics as a tool to determine how well lesions found suspicious on breast cancer screening X‐ray mammography can be categorized into malignant and benign with unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) mammography with diffusion‐weighted imaging and T2‐weighted sequences.Materials and Methods: From an asymptomatic screening cohort, 50 women with mammographically suspicious findings were examined with contrast‐enhanced breast MRI (ceMRI) at 1.5T. Out of this protocol an unenhanced, abbreviated diffusion‐weighted imaging protocol (ueMRI) including T2‐weighted, (T2w), diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and DWI with background suppression (DWIBS) sequences and corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were extracted. From ueMRI‐derived radiomic features, three Lasso‐supervised machine‐learning classifiers were constructed and compared with the clinical performance of a highly experienced radiologist: 1) univariate mean ADC model, 2) unconstrained radiomic model, 3) constrained radiomic model with mandatory inclusion of mean ADC.Results: The unconstrained and constrained radiomic classifiers consisted of 11 parameters each and achieved differentiation of malignant from benign lesions with a .632 + bootstrap receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 84.2%/85.1%, compared to 77.4% for mean ADC and 95.9%/95.9% for the experienced radiologist using ceMRI/ueMRI.Conclusion: In this pilot study we identified two ueMRI radiomics classifiers that performed well in the differentiation of malignant from benign lesions and achieved higher performance than the mean ADC parameter alone. Classification was lower than the almost perfect performance of a highly experienced breast radiologist. The potential of radiomics to provide a training‐independent diagnostic decision tool is indicated. A performance reaching the human expert would be highly desirable and based on our results is considered possible when the concept is extended in larger cohorts with further development and validation of the technique.Level of Evidence: 1Technical Efficacy: Stage 2J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:604–616Keywords
Funding Information
- Dietmar Hopp Foundation
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elastographie als Zusatzmodalität der MammasonographieDer Radiologe, 2014
- The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advancesInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2013
- FSLNeuroImage, 2012
- MITK Diffusion ImagingMethods of Information in Medicine, 2012
- Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imagingEuropean Radiology, 2010
- Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion‐weighted MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesionsEuropean Radiology, 2009
- Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis?Radiology, 2009
- User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliabilityNeuroImage, 2006
- Improvements on Cross-Validation: The .632+ Bootstrap MethodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997