Utility price regulation and time inconsistency: comparisons with monetary policy
Authors:
- Paul LevinePLPaul Levine
- Jon SternJSJon Stern
- Francesc TrillasFTFrancesc Trillas
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Oxford Economic Papers
- Vol. 57 (3) , 447-478
Abstract
We examine the hold-up problem of price regulation and compare it with the monetary policy credibility problem. For both, reputational solutions are possible provided that the policymaker is sufficiently far-sighted, but the hold-up problem in regulation turns out to be more serious than the inflation bias problem in monetary policy. Even with far-sighted regulators, a reputational equilibrium with optimal investment is undermined if capital depreciates slowly and consumer demand increases slowly. These results make the Rogoff-delegation solution to the regulatory commitment problem especially attractive. The paper concludes with a short discussion linking these results to the empirical literature on utility regulatory regimes.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Telecommunications Policies: Determinants and ImpactSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Central Bank TransparencyThe Economic Journal, 2002
- Telecom Regulation: Lessons from Independent Central BanksBusiness Strategy Review, 2001
- California's Electricity CrisisOxford Review of Economic Policy, 2001
- Government Credible Commitment to the French and American Nuclear Power IndustriesJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2001
- Can political monetary cycles be avoided?Journal of Monetary Economics, 1998
- Can reputation resolve the monetary policy credibility problem?Journal of Monetary Economics, 1994
- Trigger Price RegulationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1992
- The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary TargetThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1985
- Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal PlansJournal of Political Economy, 1977