Correlation Between Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting the Circumferential Resection Margin in Patients With Mid‐Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
- 16 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
- Vol. 39 (3) , 569-577
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the correlation between endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the circumferential resection margin (CRM) status of patients with mid‐low rectal cancer without preoperative chemoradiotherapy.Methods: Twenty patients with rectal cancer who did not receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy and underwent ERUS and MRI examinations before total mesorectal excision from May 2018 to April 2019 were included in this study. The patient and tumor characteristics, lymph nodes, tumor stages, ERUS and MRI predictors of the CRM status, and postoperative pathologic results were recorded. The closest distance between the deepest portion of lesion invasion and the mesorectal fascia was independently measured on MRI and ERUS images by 2 observers. The observers were blinded to the pathologic results. Measurements from ERUS and MRI were compared.Results: The mean distance between the distal edge of the lesion and the anal verge was 5.7 cm (range, 3.1–8.1 cm). The ERUS and pathologic evaluations of CRM involvement were consistent in 90% of the cases. The MRI and pathologic evaluations of CRM involvement were concordant in 95% of the cases. The Cohen κ coefficient of ERUS and MRI was 0.608 (P = .007). The correlation coefficient of ERUS and MRI for assessing the closest distance from the edge of cancer invasion to the mesorectal fascia was 0.99 (P = .0005).Conclusions: Endorectal ultrasound and MRI assessments of the preoperative CRM status appear to be highly consistent. Endorectal ultrasound can be used as a complementary tool with MRI to predict the CRM status of patients with mid‐low rectal cancer without preoperative chemoradiotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals of Oncology, 2017
- Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and MRI for prediction of circumferential resection margin (CRM) for rectal cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 2017
- Evaluation of Mesorectal Fascia in Mid and Low Anterior Rectal Cancer Using Endorectal Ultrasound Is Feasible and ReliableDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2014
- Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Circumferential Resection Margin Predicts Disease-Free Survival and Local Recurrence: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of the MERCURY StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- Accuracy of Endorectal Ultrasound for Measurement of the Closest Predicted Radial Mesorectal Margin for Rectal CancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2012
- The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessmentClinical and Translational Oncology, 2010
- What Is the Role for the Circumferential Margin in the Modern Treatment of Rectal Cancer?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer Depends on Location of the TumorDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005
- Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgeryThe Lancet, 2001
- Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancerThe Lancet, 1994