Perinatal epidemiologic research with vital statistics data: Validity is the essential quality
Author:
- Cande V. AnanthCACande V. Ananth
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 193 (1) , 5-6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge dataAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Reliability of Birth Certificate Data: A Multi-Hospital Comparison to Medical Records InformationMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2002
- Invited Commentary: Using Vital Statistics Databases for Perinatal Epidemiology: Does the Quality Go In Before the Name Goes On?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- New Jersey's electronic birth certificate program: variations in data sourcesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2001
- How Well Do Birth Certificates Describe the Pregnancies They Report? The Washington State Experience with Low-Risk PregnanciesMaternal and Child Health Journal, 1998
- Quality assessment of fetal death records in Georgia: a method for improvement.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- The quality of vital perinatal statistics data, with special reference to prenatal carePaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1997
- The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.American Journal of Public Health, 1993
- Validation of 1989 Tennessee Birth Certificates using Maternal and Newborn Hospital RecordsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death.American Journal of Public Health, 1988