Cost Effectiveness of a CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Strategy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results from the POPular Genetics Trial
- 7 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
- Vol. 22 (2) , 195-206
Abstract
Introduction The POPular Genetics trial demonstrated that a CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor strategy reduced bleeding rates compared with standard treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel without increasing thrombotic event rates after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective In this analysis, we aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a genotype-guided strategy compared with standard treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel. Methods A 1-year decision tree based on the POPular Genetics trial in combination with a lifelong Markov model was developed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between a genotype-guided and a standard P2Y12 inhibitor strategy in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a Dutch healthcare system perspective. Within-trial survival and utility data were combined with lifetime projections to evaluate lifetime cost effectiveness for a cohort of 1000 patients. Costs and utilities were discounted at 4 and 1.5%, respectively, according to Dutch guidelines for health economic studies. Besides deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, several scenario analyses were also conducted (different time horizons, different discount rates, equal prices for P2Y12 inhibitors, and equal distribution of thrombotic events between the two strategies). Results Base-case analysis with a hypothetical cohort of 1000 subjects demonstrated 8.98 QALYs gained and €725,550.69 in cost savings for the genotype-guided strategy (dominant). The deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model and the cost-effectiveness results. In scenario analyses, the genotype-guided strategy remained dominant. Conclusion In patients undergoing primary PCI, a CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy compared with standard treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel resulted in QALYs gained and cost savings. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01761786, Netherlands trial register number: NL2872Keywords
Funding Information
- ZonMw (171102022)
- Spartan Bioscience
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- CYP2C19 genotype–guided antiplatelet therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients—Rationale and design of the Patient Outcome after primary PCI (POPular) Genetics studyAmerican Heart Journal, 2014
- Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2013 UpdateClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2013
- Genetic testing in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a cost‐effectiveness analysisJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2013
- Cost-effectiveness of treating acute coronary syndrome patients with ticagrelor for 12 months: results from the PLATO studyEuropean Heart Journal, 2012
- PharmGKB summaryPharmacogenetics and Genomics, 2012
- Ticagrelor versus Genotype-Driven Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention after Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisValue in Health, 2011
- Reduced-Function CYP2C19 Genotype and Risk of Adverse Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Treated With Clopidogrel Predominantly for PCIJAMA, 2010
- ACCF/AHA Clopidogrel Clinical Alert: Approaches to the FDA “Boxed Warning”JACC, 2010
- Cost-Effectiveness of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Planned Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2010
- Cost‐effectiveness of ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care versus care as usualJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009