Annual Rate of Transvenous Defibrillation Lead Defects in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Over a Period of >10 Years
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 15 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 115 (19) , 2474-2480
Abstract
Background— The number of patients with longer follow-up after implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is increasing continuously. Defibrillation lead failure is a typical long-term complication. Therefore, the long-term reliability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads has become an increasing concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects related to follow-up time after lead implantation. Methods and Results— A total of 990 consecutive patients who underwent first implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator between 1992 and May 2005 were analyzed. Median follow-up time was 934 days (interquartile range, 368 to 1870). Overall, 148 defibrillation leads (15%) failed during the follow-up. The estimated lead survival rates at 5 and 8 years after implantation were 85% and 60%, respectively. The annual failure rate increased progressively with time after implantation and reached 20% in 10-year-old leads ( P P =0.06). The major lead complications were insulation defects (56%), lead fractures (12%), loss of ventricular capture (11%), abnormal lead impedance (10%), and sensing failure (10%). Conclusions— An increasing annual lead failure rate is noted primarily during long-term follow-up and reached 20% in 10-year-old leads. Patients with lead defects are younger and more often female.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Detection and management of animplantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failureJACC, 2003
- Transvenous Defibrillation Leads: High Incidence of Failure During Long‐Term Follow‐UpJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2003
- Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection FractionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Electrophysiologic Testing to Identify Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Who Are at Risk for Sudden DeathNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Komplikationen mit Sonden bei 340 Patienten mit einem implantierbaren Kardioverter/DefibrillatorClinical Research in Cardiology, 1999
- Late Complications in Patients with Pectoral Defibrillator Implants with Transvenous Defibrillator Lead Systems: High Incidence of Insulation BreakdownPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998
- A Comparison of Antiarrhythmic-Drug Therapy with Implantable Defibrillators in Patients Resuscitated from Near-Fatal Ventricular ArrhythmiasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Sensing Lead-Related Complications in Patients With Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996