Reply to Schouten et al. Comment on “Bilika et al. Applying Nociplastic Pain Criteria in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Vignette Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1179”
Open Access
- 13 May 2026
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (10) , 3741
Abstract
We thank the authors for their constructive comments on our workKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on Bilika et al. Applying Nociplastic Pain Criteria in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Vignette Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1179Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2026
- Applying Nociplastic Pain Criteria in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Vignette StudyJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2025
- Relationship of Physical Examination Technique to Associated Clinical Skills: Results from a Direct Observation AssessmentThe American Journal of Medicine, 2022
- An analysis reveals differences between pragmatic and explanatory diagnostic accuracy studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Applying modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: criteria for the classification of central sensitization pain.2014
- Applying Modern Pain Neuroscience in Clinical Practice: Criteria for the Classification of Central Sensitization PainPain Physician, 2014
- Use of Expert Panels to Define the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Research: A Systematic Review of Published Methods and ReportingPLOS Medicine, 2013
- Mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain: Part 1 of 3: Symptoms and signs of central sensitisation in patients with low back (±leg) painManual Therapy, 2012
- Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methodsHealth Technology Assessment, 2007
- Measuring the Quality of Physician Practice by Using Clinical Vignettes: A Prospective Validation StudyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004