Trained sensory panellists’ response to product alcohol content in the projective mapping task: Observations on alcohol content, product complexity and prior knowledge
Authors:
- Leanie LouwLLLeanie Louw
- Sulette OelofseSOSulette Oelofse
- Tormod NaesTNTormod Naes
- Marius LambrechtsMLMarius Lambrechts
- Pierre van RensburgPRPierre van Rensburg
- Hélène NieuwoudtHNHélène Nieuwoudt
- 1 June 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Food Quality and Preference
- Vol. 34, 37-44
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of conventional descriptive analysis and a citation frequency-based descriptive method for odor profiling: An application to Burgundy Pinot noir winesFood Quality and Preference, 2010
- Effects and influences of motivation on trained panelistsFood Quality and Preference, 2009
- What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessorsFood Quality and Preference, 2008
- The influence of interactions between major white wine components on the aroma, flavour and texture of model white wineFood Quality and Preference, 2008
- Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumersFood Quality and Preference, 2008
- Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire valleyFood Quality and Preference, 2008
- Sorting procedure as an alternative to quantitative descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory mapFood Quality and Preference, 2006
- Descriptive analysis of complex odors: reality, model or illusion?Food Quality and Preference, 1999
- Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping dataFood Quality and Preference, 1997
- Cognitive factors affecting taste intensity judgmentsFood Quality and Preference, 1996