Impact of a nanofiltration system on microplastic contamination in Geneva groundwater (Switzerland)
Open Access
- 23 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Vol. 31 (9) , 13512-13522
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) have been observed in the oceans, fresh waters, karstic water and remote water bodies. However, little is known on groundwater contamination, which is a natural resource of utmost importance for millions of people and is often perceived as a reliable source of water. Moreover, nanofiltration is perceived as a reliable technology to remove contaminants from water. In this study, large sample volumes of a silty-sandy gravel aquifer and the corresponding nanofiltered water were analysed for the presence of MPs (> 20 µm) using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy. Concentration in ground water was 8 ± 7 MPs/m3 and increased to 36 ± 11 MPs/m3 in nanofiltered water. All MPs had a maximum Ferret diameter lower than 500 µm. Size distribution of MPs was towards the small size class (20–50 µm). In groundwater, 33% of MPs were detected in the smallest size class (20–50 µm) and 67% in the 50–100-µm-size class. In comparison, around 52% of MPs in nanofiltered water were observed in the 20–50 µm size class. Moreover, 33% of the MPs observed in nanofiltered water were in the 50–100 µm size class and 15% in the 100–500-µm-size class. From a chemical point of view, different plastic polymers were identified in groundwater and in nanofiltered water, such as polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylene (vinyl acetate) copolymer (EVA), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and other polymer materials (such as polystyrene-based copolymers, vinyl-based copolymers). Fibres were observed in all samples, but only a small number of fibres (near 1%) were identified as PP synthetic fibres in nanofiltered water. Furthermore, no clear difference of fibre concentrations was observed between groundwater (232 ± 127 fibres/m3) and nanofiltered water (247 ± 118 fibres/m3). Groundwater had extremely low levels of microplastics, and although the nanofiltration effectively removes suspended particulate matter, it slightly contaminates the filtered water with MPs.Keywords
Funding Information
- FOWA-SVGW (FOWA/SIG-026-19)
- Services Industriels de Genève (FOWA/SIG-026-19)
- University of Geneva
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluentEnvironmental Pollution, 2016
- Extraction and identification of microplastic particles from secondary wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluentAnalytical Methods, 2016
- An evaluation of the migration of antimony from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic used for bottled drinking waterScience of The Total Environment, 2016
- Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plantsWater Research, 2016
- Microplastics profile along the Rhine RiverScientific Reports, 2015
- Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needsWater Research, 2015
- Synthetic particles as contaminants in German beersFood Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 2014
- High-levels of microplastic pollution in a large, remote, mountain lakeMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2014
- Application of nanofiltration for removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: rejection properties and economic evaluationJournal of Membrane Science, 2001
- Polystyrene Spherules in Coastal WatersScience, 1972