Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology
Authors:
- Tracy OnegaTOTracy Onega
- Lisa M. ReischLRLisa M. Reisch
- Paul D. FrederickPFPaul D. Frederick
- Berta M. GellerBGBerta M. Geller
- Heidi D. NelsonHNHeidi D. Nelson
- Jason P. LottJLJason P. Lott
- Andrea C. RadickARAndrea C. Radick
- David E. ElderDEDavid E. Elder
- Raymond L. BarnhillRaymond L. Barnhill
- Joann G. ElmoreJEJoann G. Elmore
- 6 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Digital Imaging
- Vol. 29 (2) , 243-253
Abstract
Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71 %). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41 %, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71 %), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44 %). Most respondents (77 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59 % agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78 % of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49 %) or not (51 %). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digital Imaging in Pathology: Whole-Slide Imaging and BeyondAnnual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, 2013
- Digital pathology: Attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology communityJournal of Pathology Informatics, 2013
- Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee (SRPC) PaperToxicologic Pathology, 2012
- Whole-slide ImagingAdvances in Anatomic Pathology, 2012
- Referenceless image quality evaluation for whole slide imagingJournal of Pathology Informatics, 2012
- Evaluation of whole slide imaging for routine surgical pathology: Looking through a broader scopeJournal of Pathology Informatics, 2012
- Digital Cytology: Current State of the Art and Prospects for the FutureActa Cytologica, 2011
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy in virtual dermatopathologySkin Research and Technology, 2011
- Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathologyJournal of Pathology Informatics, 2011
- The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathologyCytojournal, 2009