JEJoann G. Elmore

Joann G. Elmore

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Joann G. Elmore has a total of 164 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Patricia A. Carney

    Departments of Family Medicine and Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon

    11 shared publications
  • Lisa M. Reisch

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

    8 shared publications
  • Michael W. Piepkorn

    Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

    6 shared publications
  • Suzanne W. Fletcher

    Affiliations of authors: Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA (JGE); Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA (SWF)

    6 shared publications
  • William E. Barlow

    6 shared publications
  • Berta M. Geller

    Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont

    5 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Detection and classification of cancer in whole slide breast histopathology images using deep convolutional networks

    by Baris Gecer, Selim Aksoy, Ezgi Mercan, Linda G. Shapiro, Donald L. Weaver, Joann G. Elmore


  • Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions

    by Berta M. Geller, Paul D. Mph Frederick, Stevan R. Knezevich, Jason P. Md Lott, Heidi D. Nelson, Linda J. PhD Titus, Patricia A. Carney, Anna N.A. ScD Tosteson, Tracy L. PhD Onega, Raymond L. Md Barnhill, et al.

    BACKGROUND: Research examining the role of second opinions in pathology for diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess current laboratory policies, clinical use of second opinions, and pathologists' perceptions of second opinions for melanocytic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data collected from 207 pathologists in 10 US states who diagnose melanocytic lesions. The web-based survey ascertained pathologists' professional information, laboratory second opinion policy, use of second opinions, and perceptions of second opinion value for melanocytic lesions. RESULTS: Laboratory policies required second opinions for 31% of pathologists and most commonly required for melanoma in situ (26%) and invasive melanoma (30%). In practice, most pathologists reported requesting second opinions for melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential (85%) and atypical Spitzoid lesions (88%). Most pathologists perceived that second opinions increased interpretive accuracy (78%) and protected them from malpractice lawsuits (62%). CONCLUSION: Use of second opinions in clinical practice is greater than that required by laboratory policies, especially for melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential and atypical Spitzoid lesions. Quality of care in surgical interventions for atypical melanocytic proliferations critically depends on the accuracy of diagnosis in pathology reporting. Future research should examine the extent to which second opinions improve accuracy of melanocytic lesion diagnosis.


  • Multi-Instance Multi-Label Learning for Multi-Class Classification of Whole Slide Breast Histopathology Images

    by Caner Mercan, Selim Aksoy, Ezgi Mercan, Linda G. Shapiro, Donald L. Weaver, Joann G. Elmore

    Digital pathology has entered a new era with the availability of whole slide scanners that create the high-resolution images of full biopsy slides. Consequently, the uncertainty regarding the correspondence between the image areas and the diagnostic labels assigned by pathologists at the slide level, and the need for identifying regions that belong to multiple classes with different clinical significances have emerged as two new challenges. However, generalizability of the state-of-the-art algorithms, whose accuracies were reported on carefully selected regions of interest (ROIs) for the binary benign versus cancer classification, to these multi-class learning and localization problems is currently unknown. This paper presents our potential solutions to these challenges by exploiting the viewing records of pathologists and their slide-level annotations in weakly supervised learning scenarios. First, we extract candidate ROIs from the logs of pathologists' image screenings based on different behaviors, such as zooming, panning, and fixation. Then, we model each slide with a bag of instances represented by the candidate ROIs and a set of class labels extracted from the pathology forms. Finally, we use four different multi-instance multi-label learning algorithms for both slide-level and ROI-level predictions of diagnostic categories in whole slide breast histopathology images. Slide-level evaluation using 5-class and 14-class settings showed average precision values up to 81% and 69%, respectively, under different weakly labeled learning scenarios. ROI-level predictions showed that the classifier could successfully perform multi-class localization and classification within whole slide images that were selected to include the full range of challenging diagnostic categories.


  • Radiologists' interpretive skills in screening vs. diagnostic mammography: are they related?

    by Joann G. Elmore, Andrea J. Cook, Andy Bogart, Patricia A. Carney, Berta M. Geller, Stephen H. Taplin, Diana S.M. Buist, Tracy Onega, Christoph I. Lee, Diana L. Miglioretti


  • The utilization of spitz‐related nomenclature in the histological interpretation of cutaneous melanocytic lesions by practicing pathologists: results from the M‐Path study

    by Ge Zhao, Kachiu C. Lee, Sue Peacock, Lisa M. Reisch, Stevan R. Knezevich, David E. Elder, Michael W. Piepkorn, Joann G. Elmore, Raymond L. Barnhill

    Background: Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors and spitzoid melanomas (‘spitzoid lesions’) represent controversial and poorly understood cutaneous melanocytic lesions that are difficult to diagnose histologically. It is unknown how these terms are used by pathologists.Methods: We describe use of Spitz‐related terminology using data from the Melanoma Pathology (M‐Path) study database comprising pathologists' interpretations of biopsy slides, a nation‐wide study evaluating practicing US pathologists' (N = 187) diagnoses of melanocytic lesions (8976 independent diagnostic assessments on 240 total test cases, with 1 slide per case).Results: Most pathologists (90%) used the Spitz‐related terminology. However, significant variation exists in which specific lesions were diagnosed as spitzoid and in the corresponding treatment recommendations. Recommendations ranged from ‘no further treatment’ to ‘wide excision of 10 mm or greater’ with no category capturing more than 50% of responses. For spitzoid melanoma diagnoses, 90% of pathologists recommended excision with ≥10 mm margin. Pathologists report less confidence in diagnosing these lesions compared with other melanocytic proliferations and are more likely to request second opinions and additional clinical information (all p < 0.05).Conclusions: Spitzoid lesions are often not classified in any standardized way, evoke uncertainty in diagnosis by pathologists, and elicit variability in treatment recommendations.


  • Skin biopsy utilization and melanoma incidence among Medicare beneficiaries

    by M.A. Weinstock, J.P. Lott, Q. Wang, L.J. Titus, T. Onega, H.D. Nelson, L. Pearson, M. Piepkorn, R.L. Barnhill, J.G. Elmore, et al.

    Background Melanoma incidence has increased in recent decades in the U.S.A. Uncertainty remains regarding how much of this increase is attributable to greater melanoma screening activities, potential detection bias and overdiagnosis. Objectives To use a cross‐sectional ecological analysis to evaluate the relationship between skin biopsy and melanoma incidence rates over a more recent time period than prior reports. Methods Examination of the association of biopsy rates and melanoma incidence (invasive and in situ) in SEER‐Medicare data (including 10 states) for 2002–2009. Results The skin biopsy rate increased by approximately 50% (6% per year) throughout this 8‐year period, from 7012 biopsies per 100 000 persons in 2002 to 10 528 biopsies per 100 000 persons in 2009. The overall melanoma incidence rate increased approximately 4% (< 1% per year) over the same time period. The incidence of melanoma in situ increased approximately 10% (1% per year), while the incidence of invasive melanoma increased from 2002 to 2005 then decreased from 2006 to 2009. Regression models estimated that, on average, for every 1000 skin biopsies performed, an additional 5·2 (95% confidence interval 4·1–6·3) cases of melanoma in situ were diagnosed and 8·1 (95% confidence interval 6·7–9·5) cases of invasive melanoma were diagnosed. When considering individual states, some demonstrated a positive association between biopsy rate and invasive melanoma incidence, others an inverse association, and still others a more complex pattern. Conclusions Increased skin biopsies over time are associated with increased diagnosis of in situ melanoma, but the association with invasive melanoma is more complex.


  • Evaluation of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) classification scheme for diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms: Results from the International Melanoma Pathology Study Group

    by Jason P. Lott, Joann G. Elmore, Ge A. Zhao, Stevan R. Knezevich, Paul D. Frederick, Lisa M. Reisch, Emily Y. Chu, Martin G. Cook, Lyn M. Duncan, Rosalie Elenitsas, et al.


  • Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective

    by Joann G. Elmore, Heidi D. Nelson, Margaret S. Pepe, Gary M. Longton, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Berta Geller, Tracy Onega, Patricia A. Carney, Sara L. Jackson, Kimberly H. Allison, et al.

    The effect of physician diagnostic variability on accuracy at a population level depends on the prevalence of diagnoses. This study estimates how diagnostic variability affects accuracy from the pe... Background: The effect of physician diagnostic variability on accuracy at a population level depends on the prevalence of diagnoses. Objective: To estimate how diagnostic variability affects accura...


  • The self‐reported use of immunostains and cytogenetic testing in the diagnosis of melanoma by practicing U.S. pathologists of 10 selected states

    by Ge Zhao, Kachiu C. Lee, Gina Kwon, Paul D. Frederick, Tracy L. Onega, Michael W. Piepkorn, Stevan Knezevich, Raymond L. Barnhill, David E. Elder, Joann G. Elmore

    Backgrounds: The diagnosis of melanoma can be challenging, especially in lesions for which the histopathologic criteria bridge two or more taxonomic categories. Newer genomic analytical methods of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) have been introduced as ancillary techniques to differentiate benign and malignant melanocytic proliferations.Methods: We evaluated how pathologists perceive and are incorporating these new cytogenetic testing technologies into their practices. We conducted a study of 207 U.S. pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions in clinical practice in 10 SEER states. Pathologists were surveyed regarding perceptions and utilization of FISH and/or CGH in their clinical practices.Results: Results showed that 38% of pathologists use FISH and/or CGH in interpreting melanocytic lesions. Pathologists reporting FISH and/or CGH use were significantly younger (p < 0.05), were fellowship trained or board certified in dermatopathology (p < 0.001) and were affiliated with an academic institute (p < 0.001). Pathologists reporting that their colleagues consider them an expert in the assessment of melanocytic lesions were more likely to employ FISH and/or CGH in their practices than non‐experts.Conclusions: Early users of cytogenetic testing technologies in cutaneous pathology are more likely to be younger, affiliated with an academic institution and fellowship trained or board certified in dermatopathology.


  • Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology

    by Tracy Onega, Lisa M. Reisch, Paul D. Frederick, Berta M. Geller, Heidi D. Nelson, Jason P. Lott, Andrea C. Radick, David E. Elder, Raymond L. Barnhill, Michael W. Piepkorn, et al.

    Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71 %). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41 %, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71 %), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44 %). Most respondents (77 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59 % agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78 % of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49 %) or not (51 %). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.