Translation of Oxford’s CEBM catalogue of bias into Portuguese: contributing to the dissemination of conscientious thinking on health research
Authors:
- Rafael Leite PachecoRPRafael Leite Pacheco
- Carolina de Oliveira Cruz LatorracaCLCarolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca
- Ana Luiza Cabrera MartimbiancoAMAna Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco
- Luis Eduardo Santos FontesLFLuis Eduardo Santos Fontes
- Regis VieiraRVRegis Vieira
- Enderson MirandaEMEnderson Miranda
- David NunanDNDavid Nunan
- Rachel RieraRRRachel Riera
- 26 March 2020
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 25 (4) , 122-124
Abstract
Sackett, in a remarkable paper published in 1979, ‘Bias in Analytic Research’, was the first to propose a catalogue that would include a list of biases that ‘may distort the design, execution, analysis and interpretation of research’.1 2 Sacket’s pioneering work identified, labelled and discussed 35 biases. In the conclusion of this paper, Sackett highlighted, among others, two priorities for future researches: the continued development of the proposed catalogue and the empirical evaluation of the proposed biases.2Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological StudiesPLOS ONE, 2016
- Barriers to evidence‐based medicine: a systematic reviewJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2014
- Exploring Language Barriers to Evidence-based Health Care (EBHC) in Post-graduate Medical Students: A Randomised TrialEducation for Health, 2007
- Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ researchStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Bias in analytic researchJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979