Enderson Miranda
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Enderson Miranda has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David Nunan
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 shared publications - Luis Eduardo Santos Fontes
Centro Universitário Arthur Sá Earp Neto, UNIFASE, Petropolis, Brasil
2 shared publications - Rachel Riera
Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo - SP, Brazil; Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo - SP, Brazil
2 shared publications - Rafael Leite Pacheco
Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo - SP, Brazil; Centro Universitário São Camilo (CUSC), São Paulo - SP, Brazil
2 shared publications - Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco
Universidade Metropolitana de Santos
1 shared publication - Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca
Centro Universitário São Camilo, Medicine São Paulo Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 18 June 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 26 (4) , 206-208
EBM in Brazil and the creation of the Oxford-Brazil EBM Alliance
- 18 June 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 26 (4) , 206-208
EBM in Brazil and the creation of the Oxford-Brazil EBM Alliance
- 26 March 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 25 (4) , 122-124
Translation of Oxford’s CEBM catalogue of bias into Portuguese: contributing to the dissemination of conscientious thinking on health research
Sackett, in a remarkable paper published in 1979, ‘Bias in Analytic Research’, was the first to propose a catalogue that would include a list of biases that ‘may distort the design, execution, analysis and interpretation of research’.1 2 Sacket’s pioneering work identified, labelled and discussed 35 biases. In the conclusion of this paper, Sackett highlighted, among others, two priorities for future researches: the continued development of the proposed catalogue and the empirical evaluation of the proposed biases.2
- 26 March 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 25 (4) , 122-124
Translation of Oxford’s CEBM catalogue of bias into Portuguese: contributing to the dissemination of conscientious thinking on health research
Sackett, in a remarkable paper published in 1979, ‘Bias in Analytic Research’, was the first to propose a catalogue that would include a list of biases that ‘may distort the design, execution, analysis and interpretation of research’.1 2 Sacket’s pioneering work identified, labelled and discussed 35 biases. In the conclusion of this paper, Sackett highlighted, among others, two priorities for future researches: the continued development of the proposed catalogue and the empirical evaluation of the proposed biases.2