Open Soil Spectral Library (OSSL): Building reproducible soil calibration models through open development and community engagement
Authors:
- José L. SafanelliJSJosé L. Safanelli
- Tomislav HenglTHTomislav Hengl
- Leandro ParenteLPLeandro Parente
- Robert MinarikRMRobert Minarik
- Dellena E. BloomDBDellena E. Bloom
- Katherine Todd-BrownKTKatherine Todd-Brown
- Asa GholizadehAsa Gholizadeh
- Wanderson de Sousa MendesWMWanderson de Sousa Mendes
- Jonathan SandermanJSJonathan Sanderman
Preprint
Abstract
Soil spectroscopy is a widely used method for estimating soil properties that are important to environmental and agricultural monitoring. However, a bottleneck to its more widespread adoption is the need for establishing large reference datasets for training machine learning (ML) models, which are called soil spectral libraries (SSLs). Similarly, the prediction capacity of new samples is also subject to the number and diversity of soil types and conditions represented in the SSLs. To help bridge this gap and enable hundreds of stakeholders to collect more affordable soil data by leveraging a centralized open resource, the Soil Spectroscopy for Global Good has created the Open Soil Spectral Library (OSSL). In this paper, we describe the procedures for collecting and harmonizing several SSLs that are incorporated into the OSSL, followed by exploratory analysis and predictive modeling. The results of 10-fold cross-validation with refitting show that, in general, mid-infrared (MIR)-based models are significantly more accurate than visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) or near-infrared (NIR) models. From independent model evaluation, we found that Cubist comes out as the best-performing ML algorithm for the calibration and delivery of reliable outputs (prediction uncertainty and representation flag). Although many soil properties are well predicted, total sulfur, extractable sodium, and electrical conductivity performed poorly in all spectral regions, with some other extractable nutrients and physical soil properties also performing poorly in one or two spectral regions (VisNIR or Neospectra NIR). Hence, the use of predictive models based solely on spectral variations has limitations. This study also presents and discusses several other open resources that were developed from the OSSL, aspects of opening data, current limitations, and future development. With this genuinely open science project, we hope that OSSL becomes the driver of the soil spectroscopy community to accelerate the pace of scientific discovery and innovation.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: PLOS ONE, 20 (1), e0296545.
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biodiversity information goes public: GBIF at your serviceNordic Journal of Botany, 2011
- Laboratory, field and airborne spectroscopy for monitoring organic carbon content in agricultural soilsGeoderma, 2008
- Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil propertiesGeoderma, 2006
- Quality assurance and quality control in forest soil analyses: a comparison between European soil laboratoriesAccreditation and Quality Assurance, 2004
- Near‐Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy–Principal Components Regression Analyses of Soil PropertiesSoil Science Society of America Journal, 2001
- Near‐Infrared Analysis as a Rapid Method to Simultaneously Evaluate Several Soil PropertiesSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1995
- Standard Normal Variate Transformation and De-Trending of Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance SpectraApplied Spectroscopy, 1989
- Partial least-squares regression: a tutorialAnalytica Chimica Acta, 1986
- Characteristic Variations in Reflectance of Surface SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1981
- Control Procedures for Residuals Associated with Principal Component AnalysisTechnometrics, 1979