Mercy does not hold the army: a study on the dark side effect of benevolent leadership
Authors:
- 23 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Vol. 37 (1) , 133-149
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the mechanism of benevolent leadership on employee cheating behavior through two paths – employee uncertainty and perceived acceptability of norm violation – and also reveal the possible dark side of benevolent leadership. Meanwhile, the moderating effects of leader behavioral integrity in the cognition dual path process are also discussed.Design/methodology/approach: This study invites 383 employees and their superiors in seven Chinese enterprises as the research objects and conducts a paired survey at three time points, and then Mplus 7.4 software is used to analyze the empirical data.Findings: The results are shown as follows. Benevolent leadership plays a positive role on uncertainty and perceived acceptability of norm violation. Uncertainty and perceived acceptability of norm violation mediate the relationship between benevolent leadership and cheating behavior, respectively. Leader behavioral integrity moderates the positive role of benevolent leadership on uncertainty and perceived acceptability of norm violation. Leader behavioral integrity moderates the indirect effect of benevolent leadership on employees' cheating behavior through uncertainty and perceived acceptability of norm violation.Originality/value: This study reveals the mechanism behind the negative role of benevolent leadership through the cognition reaction of employees to benevolent leadership and broadens the research scope of benevolent leadership. Meanwhile, it provides some practical inspiration for leaders to effectively use the benevolent leadership style and restrain employees' cheating behavior.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization‐based self‐esteem, and performanceJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2012
- Behavioral Integrity: How Leader Referents and Trust Matter to Workplace OutcomesJournal of Business Ethics, 2012
- My Share Is Fair, So I Don’t CareJournal of Personnel Psychology, 2012
- Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX)Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2011
- Affective Job InsecurityInternational Studies of Management & Organization, 2010
- The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealthOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009
- Survey on Employee Silence and the Impact of Trust on it in ChinaActa Psychologica Sinica, 2008
- Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and "trickle down" among Black and non-Black employees.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007
- Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: the importance of social self‐esteem concernsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2003
- Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990