Key strategies for evidence synthesis through systematic reviews in Dentistry
Authors:
- Anirudha AgnihotryAAAnirudha Agnihotry
- Radhika ThakkarRTRadhika Thakkar
- Karanjot S GillKGKaranjot S Gill
- Todd SchoenbaumTSTodd Schoenbaum
- Maureen DobbinsMDMaureen Dobbins
- Richard G StevensonRSRichard G Stevenson
- Rachel CoubanRCRachel Couban
- Sagnik RaySRSagnik Ray
Open Access
- 15 February 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Dentistry Review
- Vol. 5 (1)
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviewsJournal of Dentistry, 2022
- Assessing risk of bias in a non‐randomized study2019
- Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-AnalysisBiometrics, 2017
- Diagnostic test accuracyJBI Evidence Implementation, 2015
- Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology)JBI Evidence Implementation, 2015
- Approaches to Mixed Methods Dissemination and Implementation Research: Methods, Strengths, Caveats, and OpportunitiesAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2014
- The Systematic ReviewAJN, American Journal of Nursing, 2014
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelinesAllergy, 2009
- A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelinesBMJ, 2001