A comparison of lead-based and lead-free bullets for shooting sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in Australia
Open Access
- 27 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Wildlife Research
- Vol. 50 (9) , 632-641
Abstract
Context: In response to the toxic health threats posed by lead (Pb), there is currently a focus on transitioning to lead-free bullets for shooting wild animals. Aim: We aimed to quantify the killing efficiency and animal welfare outcomes of lead-based and lead-free (copper-based) bullets for ground-based shooting of sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Methods: We used shooter-collected data from recreational diurnal hunting and professional nocturnal culling during 2020–2021. Shooters recorded rifle calibre, cartridge type, bullet mass, bullet type, shooting outcomes (miss, wound or kill), shooting distance, flight distance (the distance between where the animal was shot and where it died) as an assumed positive correlate of time to incapacitation, anatomical zones struck by bullets, and frequency of bullet exit wounds. We used flight distance as our response variable, assuming that it is positively correlated with time to incapacitation. To examine the role of several predictor variables (including bullet type) potentially influencing flight distance, the dataset was reduced to those deer killed with a single thoracic shot. Key results: Our data captured shooting events involving 276 deer, with 124 deer shot at with lead-based bullets and 152 with copper-based bullets. Most (87%) of the deer were killed with a single shot. The frequency of non-fatal wounding was <4% for both bullet types and there was no distinct difference in the probability of a single shot kill for deer shot with either bullet type. For those deer killed with a single thoracic shot (n = 198), there was no evidence that bullet energy or shooting distance influenced flight distance. After accounting for differences in terminal kinetic energy, the mean flight distance of deer shot with lead-free bullets (35 m) was 56% greater than that of deer shot with lead-based bullets (22 m). Conclusions: Lead-based and lead-free bullets produced similar animal welfare outcomes for shooting sambar deer. Implications: A transition to lead-free ammunition for shooting sambar deer would have minimal impact on efficiency or animal welfare outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of non-lead rifle ammunition for hunting in DenmarkEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 2016
- runjags: AnRPackage Providing Interface Utilities, Model Templates, Parallel Computing Methods and Additional Distributions for MCMC Models inJAGS2016
- Culling reduces fecal pellet deposition by introduced sambar ( Rusa unicolor ) in a protected water catchmentWildlife Society Bulletin, 2015
- A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning dovesWildlife Society Bulletin, 2014
- Performance of Lead-Free versus Lead-Based Hunting Ammunition in Ballistic SoapPLOS ONE, 2014
- Big game hunting in New Zealand: per capita effort, harvest and expenditure in 2011–2012New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 2014
- Review of wound ballistic research and its applicability to wildlife managementWildlife Society Bulletin, 2013
- Copper residues in meat from wild artiodactyls hunted with two types of rifle bullets manufactured from copperEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 2012
- Using presence‐only and presence–absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive speciesJournal of Applied Ecology, 2010
- Lead Bullet Fragments in Venison from Rifle-Killed Deer: Potential for Human Dietary ExposurePLOS ONE, 2009