Prognostic Significance of Elevated D-Dimer for Survival in Patients with Sarcoma
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 35 (5) , 462-467
Abstract
Background Elevated levels of D-dimer, a marker for the systemic activation of the clotting and fibrinolysis, are frequently observed in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. We examined the prognostic significance of baseline plasma D-dimer levels for predicting survival in sarcoma. Methods The study comprised of 45 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for inoperable, high-risk for relapse, or metastatic disease. Plasma D-dimer levels was measured before chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for association between plasma D-dimer levels and baseline clinical characteristics in predicting survival. Results D-dimer levels were elevated to ≥500 ng/mL in 53% (24 of 45 patients). Six of 45 patients (13%) developed VTE. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median survival for patients with VTE, metastatic disease, progression on chemotherapy, or D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was shorter (log-rank test, P=0.012, 0.001, 0.034, and 0.015, respectively). The mortality rate for patients with D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was higher (P<0.0001) than those with <500 ng/ml for both metastatic (100% vs. 62.5%) and nonmetastatic (58% vs. 31%) groups [median follow-up; 60 mo (range, 9 to 106 mo)]. Using stepwise proportional hazard model, D-dimer levels and metastasis status were independent significant predictors for survival [hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals), 4.24 (1.88-9.60), and 3.28 (1.42-7.58), respectively]. Conclusions Elevated D-dimer levels have independent significant prognostic value for survival in sarcoma patients with both metastatic and nonmetastatic disease and may help identify high-risk patients for treatment decisions.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The absence of `minor' risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of negative predictive values and negative likelihood ratiosJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- Cancer-associated thrombosisCurrent Opinion in Hematology, 2009
- Help me, Doctor! My D-dimer is raisedAnnals of Medicine, 2008
- D-dimer level influences thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- D-dimer can predict survival in patients with chronic atrial fibrillationBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 2004
- Prognostic value of a new quantitative D-dimer test in critically ill patients 24 and 48 h following admission to the intensive care unitBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 2004
- Evaluation of D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Suspected Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Coagulation Markers Predict Survival in Cancer PatientsThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2002
- Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis with D-Dimer TestingThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2000
- Coagulation system activation and increase of D‐dimer levels in peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseAmerican Journal of Hematology, 1993