Driving restrictions following defibrillator implantation: a nationwide register-linked survey study on the impact on employment, daily living, and driving behaviour
- 9 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
- Vol. 11 (7) , 889-899
Abstract
Aims: Following implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), patients are temporarily restricted from private motor vehicle driving and permanently prohibited from professional driving. We aimed to investigate the impact of driving restrictions following ICD implantation and in the case of ICD shock on employment, daily living activities, driving concerns, and driving behaviour. Methods and results: Data were retrieved from a nationwide survey on driving restrictions in Danish ICD patients, distributed in 2017 to all patients ≥18 years implanted with a first-time ICD from 2013 to 2016 (n = 3913). Responses were linked with data from nationwide registers. The response rate was 71% (final analysable population n = 2741, 83% male, median age 67 years, 316 had experienced an ICD shock, and 911 patients reported receipt of driving restrictions of minimum 1 month). Among active professional drivers (n = 175), 33% had lost their job as a direct consequence of the driving restrictions. Of those working prior to ICD implantation (n = 465), 47% reported being limited in maintaining employment due to private driving restrictions. Among those restricted from driving for a minimum of 1 month, 26% reported the restrictions overall had substantially impeded their daily living. Factors associated with substantial impediment were age <65 years [OR 1.84 (95% CI 1.35–2.52)], higher income [OR 1.47 (95% CI 1.05–2.05)], and driving ≥7 h/week pre-implantation [OR 1.66 (95% CI 1.23–2.24)]. Being nervous about driving or altering driving habits was reported by 3–7%. Conclusion: Both professional and private driving restrictions affect the ability to maintain employment and have a negative impact on ICD recipients’ daily living activities.Keywords
Funding Information
- Danish Heart Foundation (16-R107-A6633)
- Arvid Nilssons Fond
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator at risk of poorer psychological health during 24 months of follow-up (results from the Danish national DEFIB-WOMEN study)General Hospital Psychiatry, 2023
- New onset anxiety and depression in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator during 24 months of follow-up (data from the national DEFIB-WOMEN study)General Hospital Psychiatry, 2021
- Temporal Incidence of Appropriate and Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality in Secondary Prevention ICD Patients by Cardiac DiagnosisJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2021
- The Value of Autonomy for the Good Life. An Empirical Investigation of Autonomy and Life Satisfaction in EuropeSocial Indicators Research, 2020
- Age, Sex, and Remote Monitoring Differences in Device Acceptance for Patients With Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators in CanadaCJC Open, 2020
- Driving restrictions in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakersJournal of Arrhythmia, 2017
- The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2014
- Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart FailureHeart Failure Clinics, 2013
- Consensus Statement: Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: Updated Recommendations for Driving by Patients with Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2010
- Driving and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks for Ventricular ArrhythmiasJACC, 2007