EXPRESS: Choosing Larger Portion Sizes for Others
Open Access
- 12 March 2026
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing
Abstract
Consumers’ portion size choices are important, as they can influence how much food is eaten and wasted. While previous research has focused on self-selected portion sizes, this research examines portion size choices for others. The authors demonstrate that consumers choose larger portion sizes for others than for themselves, across both healthy and unhealthy foods, and for a wide range of different others. Choosing larger portion sizes for others is problematic, as the authors show that it can contribute to increased food waste. Both process-consistent moderation and mediation show that one driver of choosing larger portion sizes for others is consumers’ desire to view themselves as being caring. Alternative accounts (e.g., predicting that others want to eat more than the self, greater consumption amount uncertainty for others than the self) are addressed. Finally, a process-consistent intervention that reframes the meaning of being caring as mitigating the burden of unwanted leftovers for others decreases portion size choices for others. Altogether, this research offers theoretical contributions to the literatures on food decision-making and choices for others and offers practical contributions by identifying a novel contributor to food waste in social contexts and thus a potential target for interventions aimed at mitigating food waste.Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- An integrative review of gift‐giving research in consumer behavior and marketingJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2022
- Relational Spending in Funerals: Caring for Others Loved and LostJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2021
- Gift Recipients’ Beliefs About Occasion‐based and Nonoccasion‐based Gifts: The Importance of Signaling Care and Meeting Expectations in Gift GivingJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2021
- Any Size for a Dollar: The Effect of Any‐Size‐Same‐Price Versus Standard Pricing on Beverage Size ChoicesJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2019
- The seven sins of consumer psychologyJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2013
- Dictator games: a meta studyExperimental Economics, 2011
- A History of Food2008
- Measuring and exploring symbolic money meaningsPsychology & Marketing, 2007
- Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindnessInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1998
- Two Types of Altruistic Behavior: Doing Good to Feel Good or to Make the Other Feel Good1982