Interpractice variability in antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections: a cross-sectional study of Australian early-career general practitioners
Open Access
Abstract
Objectives Frequency of general practitioners’ (GPs’) antibiotic prescribing for acute, self-limiting respiratory tract infections (aRTIs) is high. The practice environment and culture influence the clinical behaviour, including prescribing behaviour, of GP specialist vocational trainees (registrars). We aimed to assess inter-practice variability in registrars’ antibiotic prescribing. Design This was a cross-sectional analysis from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study, from 2010 to 2020. Setting ReCEnT documents registrars’ clinical experiences and behaviours. Before 2016, 5 of 17 Australian training regions participated in ReCEnT. From 2016, three of nine regions (~40% of Australian registrars) participated. Participants 3210 registrars (response rate 91.8%) from 1286 training practices contributed to the analysis. Outcome measures The outcomes were prescription of an antibiotic for new diagnoses of (1) all aRTIs and (2) acute bronchitis diagnoses specifically. Prescribing percentages were calculated at the training practice level. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the ratio of interpractice variation to total variance. Median ORs (MORs) were also estimated to quantify interpractice variability. Results Practice-level antibiotic prescribing percentages ranged from 0% to 100% for both aRTIs and acute bronchitis diagnoses in the primary analysis. ICCs for aRTI prescribing were 0.08 (unadjusted) and 0.02 (adjusted). For acute bronchitis, ICCs were 0.10 (unadjusted) and 0.05 (adjusted). MORs were 1.66 (unadjusted) and 1.32 (adjusted) for aRTIs. MORs for acute bronchitis were 1.80 (unadjusted) and 1.53 (adjusted). This indicates a marked variation in the odds of a patient receiving antibiotics for an aRTI if randomly attending different practices. Conclusions There was considerable interpractice variation in registrars’ antibiotic prescribing frequencies. Further research is required to examine the factors accounting for this variation and to develop practice-level interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing in high-prescribing practices.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1153299)
- Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government (Not applicable/No award number)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections and acute bronchitis: a longitudinal analysis of general practitioner traineesFamily Practice, 2022
- Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysisThe Lancet, 2022
- Development and validation of antibiotic stewardship metrics for outpatient respiratory tract diagnoses and association of provider characteristics with inappropriate prescribingInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2021
- Identifying English Practices that Are High Antibiotic Prescribers Accounting for Comorbidities and Other Legitimate Medical Reasons for VariationeClinicalMedicine, 2018
- Antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitisExpert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2016
- Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections: a cross-sectional analysis of the ReCEnT study exploring the habits of early-career doctors in primary careFamily Practice, 2014
- Diagnosing infections: a qualitative view on prescription decisions in general practice over timePharmacy World & Science, 2010
- Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database studyThe Lancet, 2005
- Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004