Racial Disparities and the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Maternal Mortality: A Literature Review
Authors:
- Gustavo Gonçalves dos SantosGustavo Gonçalves dos Santos
- Anuli NjokuAnuli Njoku
- Ana Carolina Pereira MassAMAna Carolina Pereira Mass
- Ellen Eduarda Santos RibeiroEREllen Eduarda Santos Ribeiro
- Letícia Eduarda de OliveiraLOLetícia Eduarda de Oliveira
- Maria Julia Cunha Silva LimaMLMaria Julia Cunha Silva Lima
- Taís de Abreu FerroTFTaís de Abreu Ferro
- Lilian Reinaldi Ribeiro PiroziLPLilian Reinaldi Ribeiro Pirozi
- Antônio Augusto de Freitas PeregrinoAPAntônio Augusto de Freitas Peregrino
- Célia Maria Pinheiro dos SantosCSCélia Maria Pinheiro dos Santos
- Lucia Helena Ferreira VianaLVLucia Helena Ferreira Viana
- Marilda Gonçalves de SousaMSMarilda Gonçalves de Sousa
Open Access
- 10 June 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Epidemiologia
- Vol. 7 (3) , 81
Abstract
Background: Maternal mortality remains a major global health challenge, disproportionately affecting black and Indigenous women. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and postpartum hemorrhage are the leading direct causes of maternal death. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have emerged as potential strategies for predicting these complications, yet concerns persist about their equity and validation across racial groups. Methods: A rapid review was conducted in five databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS, to synthesize recent evidence on the use of AI for preventing maternal mortality due to hypertension and postpartum hemorrhage. Studies published in the last five years that included racial or ethnic data were selected and analyzed narratively. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, showing high predictive accuracy of AI models (AUROC often >0.95) for severe maternal outcomes. However, few models incorporated racial variables or underwent external validation in racially diverse or low-resource populations. Evidence suggests that unrepresentative datasets may perpetuate or exacerbate existing health inequities. Conclusions: AI demonstrates strong technical performance in predicting maternal complications but limited equity in application. Broader racial representation, external validation, and ethical governance are essential for ensuring that AI-based tools reduce rather than reinforce racial disparities in maternal mortality.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial intelligence in prediction of postpartum hemorrhage: a primer and reviewInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2025
- The Algorithmic Divide: A Systematic Review on AI-Driven Racial Disparities in HealthcareJournal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 2024
- Early warning systems for identifying severe maternal outcomes: findings from the WHO global maternal sepsis studyeClinicalMedicine, 2024
- Externally validated prediction models for pre‐eclampsia: systematic review and meta‐analysisUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2024
- Social Determinant Pathways to Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Nulliparous U.S. WomenWomen's Health Issues, 2023
- Machine learning and disease prediction in obstetricsCurrent Research in Physiology, 2023
- Racial disparities in care escalation for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 2023
- Machine‐learning‐based prediction of pre‐eclampsia using first‐trimester maternal characteristics and biomarkersUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2022
- Reducing Implicit Bias in Maternity Care: A Framework for ActionWomen's Health Issues, 2022
- Trajectories of vital signs in patients with COVID-19Resuscitation, 2020