Intertester Agreement in Refractive Error Measurements
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Optometry and Vision Science
- Vol. 90 (10) , 1128-1137
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the intertester agreement of refractive error measurements between lay and nurse screeners using the Retinomax Autorefractor and the SureSight Vision Screener. Methods: Trained lay and nurse screeners measured refractive error in 1452 preschoolers (3 to 5 years old) using the Retinomax and the SureSight in a random order for screeners and instruments. Intertester agreement between lay and nurse screeners was assessed for sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) using the mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement. The mean intertester difference (lay minus nurse) was compared between groups defined based on the child's age, cycloplegic refractive error, and the reading's confidence number using analysis of variance. The limits of agreement were compared between groups using the Brown‐Forsythe test. Intereye correlation was accounted for in all analyses. Results: The mean intertester differences (95% limits of agreement) were −0.04 (−1.63, 1.54) diopter (D) sphere, 0.00 (−0.52, 0.51) D cylinder, and −0.04 (1.65, 1.56) D SE for the Retinomax and 0.05 (−1.48, 1.58) D sphere, 0.01 (−0.58, 0.60) D cylinder, and 0.06 (−1.45, 1.57) D SE for the SureSight. For either instrument, the mean intertester differences in sphere and SE did not differ by the child's age, cycloplegic refractive error, or the reading's confidence number. However, for both instruments, the limits of agreement were wider when eyes had significant refractive error or the reading's confidence number was below the manufacturer's recommended value. Conclusions: Among Head Start preschool children, trained lay and nurse screeners agree well in measuring refractive error using the Retinomax or the SureSight. Both instruments had similar intertester agreement in refractive error measurements independent of the child's age. Significant refractive error and a reading with low confidence number were associated with worse intertester agreement.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Eye Institute
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- ROC Analysis of the Accuracy of Noncycloplegic Retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for Preschool Vision ScreeningInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2011
- Accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight for measurement of magnitude of astigmatism in 3- to 7-year-old childrenJournal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2009
- Field evaluation of the Welch Allyn SureSight™ Vision Screener: Incorporating the Vision in Preschoolers study recommendationsJournal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2007
- Impact of Confidence Number on the Screening Accuracy of the Retinomax AutorefractorOptometry and Vision Science, 2007
- Preschool Vision Screening Tests Administered by Nurse Screeners Compared with Lay Screeners in the Vision in Preschoolers StudyInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2005
- Sensitivity of Screening Tests for Detecting Vision In Preschoolers‐targeted Vision Disorders When Specificity Is 94%Optometry and Vision Science, 2005
- Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the vision in preschoolers study*1Ophthalmology, 2004
- Comparison between two hand-held autorefractors: the Sure-Sight and the RetinomaxStrabismus, 2004
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Robust Tests for the Equality of VariancesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974