German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study
Authors:
- Jannik ZimmermannJZJannik Zimmermann
- Harriet MorfHMHarriet Morf
- Florian ScharfFSFlorian Scharf
- Johannes KnitzaJKJohannes Knitza
- Heidi MoellerHMHeidi Moeller
- Felix MuehlensiepenFMFelix Muehlensiepen
- Michaela NathrathMNMichaela Nathrath
- Till OrlemannTOTill Orlemann
- Thomas VoelkerTVThomas Voelker
- Merlin DeckersMDMerlin Deckers
Open Access
- 21 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Human Factors
- Vol. 11, e57771
Abstract
Background: The exponential growth of telehealth is revolutionizing health care delivery, but its evaluation has not matched the pace of its uptake. Various forms of assessment, from single-item to more extensive questionnaires, have been used to assess telehealth and digital therapeutics and their usability. The most frequently used questionnaire is the “Telehealth Usability Questionnaire” (TUQ). The use of the TUQ is limited by its restricted availability in languages other than English and its feasibility. Objective: The aims of this study were to create a translated German TUQ version and to derive a short questionnaire for patients—“Telehealth Usability and Perceived Usefulness Short Questionnaire for patients” (TUUSQ). Methods: As a first step, the original 21-item TUQ was forward and back-translated twice. In the second step, 13 TUQ items were selected for their suitability for the general evaluation of telehealth on the basis of expert opinion. These 13 items were surveyed between July 2022 and September 2023 in 4 studies with patients and family members of palliative care, as well as patients with chronic autoimmune diseases, evaluating 13 health care apps, including digital therapeutics and a telehealth system (n1=128, n2=220, n3=30, and n4=12). Psychometric exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Results: The analysis revealed that a parsimonious factor structure with 2 factors (“perceived usefulness in health care” and “usability”) is sufficient to describe the patient’s perception. Consequently, the questionnaire could be shortened to 6 items without compromising its informativeness. Conclusions: We provide a linguistically precise German version of the TUQ for assessing the usability and perceived usefulness of telehealth. Beyond that, we supply a highly feasible shortened version that is versatile for general use in telehealth, mobile health, and digital therapeutics, which distinguishes between the 2 factors “perceived usefulness in health care” and “usability” in patients. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Student-led clinics and ePROs to accelerate diagnosis and treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from a prospective pilot studyRheumatology International, 2023
- Real-world usage of digital health applications (DiGA) in rheumatology: results from a German patient surveyRheumatology International, 2022
- Transitioning to telehealth? A guide to evaluating outcomesHealth Policy and Technology, 2022
- Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trustInternational Journal of Information Management, 2017
- The impacts of second generation e-prescribing usability on community pharmacists outcomesResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2015
- A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.Psychological Assessment, 2010
- Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication ErrorsJAMA, 2005
- An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse educationInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2004
- Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO StandardsSoftware Quality Journal, 2003
- A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1965