Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 130, 156-160
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current usersJBI Evidence Implementation, 2019
- Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirementsHealth Information and Libraries Journal, 2019
- The development of software to support multiple systematic review typesJBI Evidence Implementation, 2019
- An International Educational Training Course for Conducting Systematic Reviews in Health Care: The Joanna Briggs Institute's Comprehensive Systematic Review Training ProgramWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2018
- Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2018
- Systematic Reviews in Burns CareJournal of Burn Care & Research, 2017
- A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the methodJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
- An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping ReviewsWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2016
- A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistencyResearch Synthesis Methods, 2014
- Scoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005