Acellular Dermal Matrix–Associated Complications in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Human Tissues
Authors:
- 24 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 148 (3) , 493-500
Abstract
Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction accounts for the vast majority of breast reconstruction procedures and is commonly performed with human acellular dermal matrix. There is no consensus as to the optimal human acellular dermal matrix preparation, and high-quality evidence concerning comparative effectiveness is lacking. This study is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to compare human acellular dermal matrix–related complications of the two most commonly used human acellular dermal matrices in implant-based breast reconstruction. The authors hypothesize that there will be no difference in infection, seroma, and reconstructive failure between FlexHD Pliable and AlloDerm RTU. Methods: The authors conducted a Level 1 prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to assess complications associated with the use of two human acellular dermal matrices in immediate postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction across seven clinical sites. Group A patients received FlexHD Pliable (113 patients with 187 breast reconstructions), and group B patients received AlloDerm RTU (117 patients with 197 breast reconstructions). Results: There was no significant difference with respect to patient demographics, indications, comorbidities, and reconstruction approach between groups. Mean follow-up time was 10.7 ± 3.2 months. There was no statistical difference in the overall matrix-related complications between groups A and B (4.3 percent versus 7.1 percent, p = 0.233). Obesity (OR, 1.14; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.24; p = 0.001) and prepectoral placement of matrix (OR, 4.53; 95 percent CI, 1.82 to 11.3; p = 0.001) were independently associated with greater risks of overall matrix-related complications. Conclusion: This work supports the use of human acellular dermal matrices in implant-based breast reconstruction and demonstrates no significant difference in matrix-related complication rates between FlexHD Pliable and AlloDerm RTU. Clinical Question/Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, I.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparative Analysis of Cryopreserved Versus Prehydrated Human Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2013
- Complications in Tissue Expander Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2012
- A Meta-Analysis of Human Acellular Dermis and Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- Retrospective Review of 331 Consecutive Immediate Single-Stage Implant Reconstructions with Acellular Dermal MatrixPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- The Effect of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Tissue Expander/Implant Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2010
- Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and the Risk of Postoperative ComplicationsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Acellular Dermis–Assisted Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction versus Complete Submuscular Coverage: A Head-to-Head Comparison of OutcomesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- AlloDerm Performance in the Setting of Prosthetic Breast Surgery, Infection, and IrradiationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Expander/Implant Reconstruction with AlloDerm: Recent ExperiencePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Predicting Complications following Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: An Outcomes Analysis Based on Preoperative Clinical RiskPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008