Model-based small area estimation methods and precise district-level HIV prevalence estimates in Uganda
Open Access
- 6 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (8) , e0253375
Abstract
Background: Model-based small area estimation methods can help generate parameter estimates at the district level, where planned population survey sample sizes are not large enough to support direct estimates of HIV prevalence with adequate precision. We computed district-level HIV prevalence estimates and their 95% confidence intervals for districts in Uganda. Methods: Our analysis used direct survey and model-based estimation methods, including Fay-Herriot (area-level) and Battese-Harter-Fuller (unit-level) small area models. We used regression analysis to assess for consistency in estimating HIV prevalence. We use a ratio analysis of the mean square error and the coefficient of variation of the estimates to evaluate precision. The models were applied to Uganda Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment 2016/2017 data with auxiliary information from the 2016 Lot Quality Assurance Sampling survey and antenatal care data from district health information system datasets for unit-level and area-level models, respectively. Results: Estimates from the model-based and the direct survey methods were similar. However, direct survey estimates were unstable compared with the model-based estimates. Area-level model estimates were more stable than unit-level model estimates. The correlation between unit-level and direct survey estimates was (β1 = 0.66, r2 = 0.862), and correlation between area-level model and direct survey estimates was (β1 = 0.44, r2 = 0.698). The error associated with the estimates decreased by 37.5% and 33.1% for the unit-level and area-level models, respectively, compared to the direct survey estimates. Conclusions: Although the unit-level model estimates were less precise than the area-level model estimates, they were highly correlated with the direct survey estimates and had less standard error associated with estimates than the area-level model. Unit-level models provide more accurate and reliable data to support local decision-making when unit-level auxiliary information is available.Keywords
Funding Information
- Welcome Trust through The DELTAS Africa Initiative and SSACAB (107754/Z/15/Z)
- US President’s Plan for AIDS Relief (U2GGH001226)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-risk motorcycle taxi drivers in the HIV/AIDS era: a respondent-driven sampling survey in Kampala, UgandaInternational Journal of STD & AIDS, 2014
- Strengthening district-based health reporting through the district health management information software system: the Ugandan experienceBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2014
- HIV Infection in Fishing Communities of Lake Victoria Basin of Uganda – A Cross-Sectional Sero-Behavioral SurveyPLOS ONE, 2013
- Estimating unmet need for contraception by district within Ghana: An application of small-area estimation techniquesPopulation Studies, 2012
- The Socio‐Economic Determinants of HIV/AIDS Infection Rates in Lesotho, Malawi, Swaziland and ZimbabweDevelopment Policy Review, 2012
- HIV Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors among Individuals Aged 13-34 Years in Rural Western KenyaPLOS ONE, 2009
- Bootstrap mean squared error of a small-area EBLUPJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 2008
- Global review of health care surveys using lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS), 1984–2004Social Science & Medicine, 2006
- Mixed model prediction and small area estimationTEST, 2006
- An Error-Components Model for Prediction of County Crop Areas Using Survey and Satellite DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988