PISA and its consequences: Shaping education policies through international comparisons
- 23 April 2017
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Education
- Vol. 52 (2) , 175-183
Abstract
As the field of education has become a highly internationalised policy field in the last decade, international organisations such as the OECD play an ever more decisive role in the dissemination of knowledge, monitoring of outcomes, and research in education policy. Although the OECD lacks any binding governance instruments to put coercion on States or to provide material incentive, it has successively expanded its competences in this field. OECD advanced its status as an expert organisation in the field of education mainly by designing and conducting the international comparative PISA study. With PISA, the OECD was able to greatly influence national education systems. Basically, States were faced with external advice based on sound empirical data that challenged existing domestic policies, politics, and ideas. One prominent case for the impact of PISA is Germany. PISA was a decisive watershed in German education policy‐making. Almost instantly after the PISA results were publicised in late 2001, a comprehensive education reform agenda was put forward in Germany. The experienced reform dynamic was highly surprising because the traditional German education system and politics were characterised by deep‐rooted historical legacies, many involved stakeholders at different levels, and reform‐hampering institutions. Hence, a backlog of grand education reforms have prevailed in Germany since the 1970s. The external pressure exerted by PISA completely changed that situation.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Globalisation and the politics of international tests: the case of IsraelComparative Education, 2012
- Why is there no comprehensive education in Germany? A historical explanationHistory of Education, 2010
- Politics of Externalization in Reflexive Times: Reinventing Japanese Education Reform Discourses through “Finnish PISA Success”Comparative Education Review, 2010
- Globalization and the Growth of International Educational Testing and National AssessmentComparative Education Review, 2010
- Standardisation and ‘quick languages’: the shape‐shifting of standardised measurement of pupil achievement in Sweden and GermanyComparative Education, 2009
- Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in EuropeJournal of Education Policy, 2009
- The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debateComparative Education, 2008
- The value of international comparative studies of achievement – a Danish perspectiveAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2008
- The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic DevelopmentJournal of Economic Literature, 2008
- Re‐imagining and rescripting the future of education: global knowledge economy discourses and the challenge to education systemsComparative Education, 2005